109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15156703)
1. Comparison of measured and calculated radiotherapy doses in the chest region of an inhomogeneous humanoid phantom.
McDermott L; Perkins A
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2004 Mar; 27(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 15156703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Monte Carlo dose calculations for a 6-MV photon beam in a thorax phantom.
Farajollahi A; Mesbahi A
Radiat Med; 2006 May; 24(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 16958400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Photon beam relative dose validation of the DPM Monte Carlo code in lung-equivalent media.
Chetty IJ; Charland PM; Tyagi N; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Bielajew AF
Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):563-73. PubMed ID: 12722808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Entrance dose measurement: a simple and reliable technique.
Banjade DP; Raj TA; Ng BS; Xavier S; Tajuddin AA; Shukri A
Med Dosim; 2003; 28(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 12804703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Testing of the analytical anisotropic algorithm for photon dose calculation.
Van Esch A; Tillikainen L; Pyykkonen J; Tenhunen M; Helminen H; Siljamäki S; Alakuijala J; Paiusco M; Lori M; Huyskens DP
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4130-48. PubMed ID: 17153392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surface and superficial dose dosimetric verification for postmastectomy radiotherapy.
Shiau AC; Chiu MC; Chen TH; Chiou JF; Shueng PW; Chen SW; Chen WL; Kuan WP
Med Dosim; 2012; 37(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 22552120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of superficial dosimetry between treatment planning system and measurement for several breast cancer treatment techniques.
Akino Y; Das IJ; Bartlett GK; Zhang H; Thompson E; Zook JE
Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011714. PubMed ID: 23298084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A dosimetry study of post-mastectomy radiation therapy with AeroForm tissue expander.
Lim SB; Kuo LC; Li G; Kuo HC; McCormick B; Cahlon O; Powell S; Hong LX
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 21(9):33-38. PubMed ID: 32614518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Verification of tangential breast treatment dose calculations in a commercial 3D treatment planning system.
Baird CT; Starkschall G; Liu HH; Buchholz TA; Hogstrom KR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2001; 2(2):73-84. PubMed ID: 11604052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetric accuracy of tomotherapy dose calculation in thorax lesions.
Ardu V; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Mangili P; Calandrino R
Radiat Oncol; 2011 Feb; 6():14. PubMed ID: 21306629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Technical note: Heterogeneity dose calculation accuracy in IMRT: study of five commercial treatment planning systems using an anthropomorphic thorax phantom.
Davidson SE; Popple RA; Ibbott GS; Followill DS
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5434-9. PubMed ID: 19175103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of Varian's AAA algorithm with focus on lung treatments.
Rønde HS; Hoffmann L
Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 18803058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Determining the incident electron fluence for Monte Carlo-based photon treatment planning using a standard measured data set.
Keall PJ; Siebers JV; Libby B; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):574-82. PubMed ID: 12722809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in phantoms with lung equivalent heterogeneities under conditions of lateral electronic disequilibrium.
Carrasco P; Jornet N; Duch MA; Weber L; Ginjaume M; Eudaldo T; Jurado D; Ruiz A; Ribas M
Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2899-911. PubMed ID: 15543799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Verification measurements and clinical evaluation of the iPlan RT Monte Carlo dose algorithm for 6 MV photon energy.
Petoukhova AL; van Wingerden K; Wiggenraad RG; van de Vaart PJ; van Egmond J; Franken EM; van Santvoort JP
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4601-14. PubMed ID: 20668337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of beam model differences in the comparison of dose calculation algorithms for lung cancer treatment planning.
Chetty IJ; Rosu M; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Ten Haken RK
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):801-15. PubMed ID: 15798256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Superficial dose distribution in breast for tangential radiation treatment, Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse algorithms in case of phantom and patient geometries.
Chakarova R; Gustafsson M; Bäck A; Drugge N; Palm Å; Lindberg A; Berglund M
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 21741719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of measured and calculated doses in a Rando phantom with a realistic lung radiotherapy treatment plan including heterogeneities.
Bouacid SS; Kharfi F; Boulakhssaim F
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2018 Nov; 57(4):365-373. PubMed ID: 30206695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in slab phantoms with cortical bone equivalent heterogeneities.
Carrasco P; Jornet N; Duch MA; Panettieri V; Weber L; Eudaldo T; Ginjaume M; Ribas M
Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3323-33. PubMed ID: 17879796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
