These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15156892)
1. It takes two, baby: fathers, the tort of conversion, and its application to the abortion of pre-viability fetuses. Pahl MR Whittier Law Rev; 2002; 24(1):221-51. PubMed ID: 15156892 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion: the father's rights. Gilbert RA Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1973; 42(3):441-67. PubMed ID: 11664234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Roe v. Wade: what rights the biological father? Georgius EH Hastings Constit Law Q; 1974; 1(1):251-72. PubMed ID: 11664368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Using the courts to stop abortion by injunction: Mock v. Brandanburg. Martin SL Can J Women Law; 1989-1990; 3(2):569-83. PubMed ID: 11659311 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion and maternal-fetal conflict: broadening our concerns. Shultz MM South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 1992; 1():79-98. PubMed ID: 16437820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cultural feminism: it sounds good, but will it work? Application to a husband's interest in his wife's abortion decision. Brunner SD Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1996; 22(1):101-23. PubMed ID: 16437821 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Autonomy, consent, and the conflict of rights in health care. Procaccino JA Air Force Law Rev; 1990; 33():183-91. PubMed ID: 15991412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A woman's right to choose: wrongful death statutes and abortion rights--consistent at last. Siano JR Womens Rights Law Report; 1998; 19(3):279-92. PubMed ID: 15871153 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Rights of embryo and foetus in private law. Jost TS Am J Comp Law; 2002; 50(3):633-46. PubMed ID: 15212066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Moral rights and abortion. McLachlan HV Contemp Rev; 1976 Jun; 228(1325):323-8. PubMed ID: 11663704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. What's good for the goose is good for the gander: toward recognition of men's reproductive rights. Totz MA North Ill Univ Law Rev; 1994; 15(1):141-236. PubMed ID: 11660320 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion rights after South Dakota. McDonagh E Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The unborn child in Canadian law. Weiler KM; Catton K Osgoode Hall Law J; 1976 Dec; 14(3):643-59. PubMed ID: 11664746 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Abortion--father held to have no right to restrain mother of unborn child from obtaining abortion. Howell N Cumberland Samford Law Rev; 1974; 4(3):594-601. PubMed ID: 11661221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Roe and the new frontier. Roy LS Harv J Law Public Policy; 2003; 27(1):339-83. PubMed ID: 15568255 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Greco v. United States: a step forward or backward from Roe v. Wade? Kayne MS Womens Rights Law Report; 1996; 17(3):367-80. PubMed ID: 11863013 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Reply to Sarah Burns. Colker R Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():207-14. PubMed ID: 16032808 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The application of traditional criminal law to misappropriation of gametic materials. Ayala K Am J Crim Law; 1997; 24(3):503-39. PubMed ID: 16086480 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Consent provisions in abortion statutes. Levitz KB Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1973; 1(4):645-62. PubMed ID: 11664386 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Who gets to choose? Responses to the foetal/maternal conflict. Hyams R E Law; 1995 Dec; 2(3):E7. PubMed ID: 16969923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]