478 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15157210)
1. Increased detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by additional sampling from the anterior lateral horns of the peripheral zone in combination with the standard sextant biopsy.
Miyake H; Sakai I; Harada K; Hara I; Eto H
Int J Urol; 2004 Jun; 11(6):402-6. PubMed ID: 15157210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of potentially insignificant prostate cancer in men undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically organ-confined disease.
Miyake H; Sakai I; Harada K; Hara I; Eto H
Int J Urol; 2005 Mar; 12(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 15828954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does increased needle biopsy sampling of the prostate detect a higher number of potentially insignificant tumors?
Chan TY; Chan DY; Stutzman KL; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2181-4. PubMed ID: 11696731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
King CR; McNeal JE; Gill H; Presti JC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jun; 59(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 15145152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of cancers detected at only a sextant or alternative location.
Ochiai A; Troncoso P; Babaian RJ
BJU Int; 2008 Apr; 101(7):837-40. PubMed ID: 18070187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer.
Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):104-9; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11435833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved accuracy for predicting the Gleason score of prostate cancer by increasing the number of transrectal biopsy cores.
Miyake H; Kurahashi T; Takenaka A; Hara I; Fujisawa M
Urol Int; 2007; 79(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 18025846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate cancer diagnosis using a saturation needle biopsy technique after previous negative sextant biopsies.
Stewart CS; Leibovich BC; Weaver AL; Lieber MM
J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):86-91; discussion 91-2. PubMed ID: 11435830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Individualization of the biopsy protocol according to the prostate gland volume for prostate cancer detection.
Eskicorapci SY; Guliyev F; Akdogan B; Dogan HS; Ergen A; Ozen H
J Urol; 2005 May; 173(5):1536-40. PubMed ID: 15821481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The relationship between tumor volume and the number of positive cores in men undergoing multisite extended biopsy: implication for expectant management.
Ochiai A; Troncoso P; Chen ME; Lloreta J; Babaian RJ
J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2164-8, discussion 2168. PubMed ID: 16280756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pathological features of prostate cancer detected on initial and repeat prostate biopsy: results of the prospective European Prostate Cancer Detection study.
Djavan B; Mazal P; Zlotta A; Wammack R; Ravery V; Remzi M; Susani M; Borkowski A; Hruby S; Boccon-Gibod L; Schulman CC; Marberger M
Prostate; 2001 May; 47(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 11340633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Extended 21-sample needle biopsy protocol for diagnosis of prostate cancer in 1000 consecutive patients.
Guichard G; Larré S; Gallina A; Lazar A; Faucon H; Chemama S; Allory Y; Patard JJ; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Yiou R; Salomon L; Abbou CC; de la Taille A
Eur Urol; 2007 Aug; 52(2):430-5. PubMed ID: 17412489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: when should we stop?
Djavan B; Ravery V; Zlotta A; Dobronski P; Dobrovits M; Fakhari M; Seitz C; Susani M; Borkowski A; Boccon-Gibod L; Schulman CC; Marberger M
J Urol; 2001 Nov; 166(5):1679-83. PubMed ID: 11586201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pathological parameters of radical prostatectomy for clinical stages T1c versus T2 prostate adenocarcinoma: decreased pathological stage and increased detection of transition zone tumors.
Jack GS; Cookson MS; Coffey CS; Vader V; Roberts RL; Chang SS; Smith JA; Shappell SB
J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):519-24. PubMed ID: 12131301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of extended pattern technique for initial prostate biopsy.
Siu W; Dunn RL; Shah RB; Wei JT
J Urol; 2005 Aug; 174(2):505-9. PubMed ID: 16006881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Percentages of positive cores, cancer length and Gleason grade 4/5 cancer in systematic sextant biopsy are all predictive of adverse pathology and biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.
Suekane S; Noguchi M; Nakashima O; Yamada S; Kojiro M; Matsuoka K
Int J Urol; 2007 Aug; 14(8):713-8. PubMed ID: 17681061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Additional sampling of dorsal apex on systematic prostate biopsy: impact on early detection of prostate cancer.
Miyake H; Harada K; Inoue TA; Takenaka A; Hara I; Fujisawa M
Urology; 2007 Apr; 69(4):738-42. PubMed ID: 17445661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostate biopsy: who, how and when. An update.
Djavan B; Milani S; Remzi M
Can J Urol; 2005 Feb; 12 Suppl 1():44-8; discussion 99-100. PubMed ID: 15780165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Percentage of cancer in prostate biopsies as prognostic factor for staging and postoperative biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.
Villamón-Fort R; Martínez-Jabaloyas JM; Soriano-Sarriá P; Ramos-Soler D; Pastor-Hernández F; Gil-Salom M
Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):328-33. PubMed ID: 17495491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
