These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15157727)

  • 41. A tale of two methods: randomization versus matching trials in clinical research.
    Spiegel D; Kraemer HC; Bloom JR
    Psychooncology; 1998; 7(5):371-5. PubMed ID: 9809328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Using documents to investigate links between implementation and sustainability in a complex community intervention: the PRISM study.
    Willis K; Small R; Brown S
    Soc Sci Med; 2012 Oct; 75(7):1222-9. PubMed ID: 22749443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Supporting breastfeeding In Local Communities (SILC) in Victoria, Australia: a cluster randomised controlled trial.
    McLachlan HL; Forster DA; Amir LH; Cullinane M; Shafiei T; Watson LF; Ridgway L; Cramer RL; Small R
    BMJ Open; 2016 Feb; 6(2):e008292. PubMed ID: 26832427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Managing waterway health in the Goulburn Broken Catchment, Victoria, Australia.
    Tennant W; Sheed J
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(9):29-36. PubMed ID: 11419136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A nomogram for single-stage cluster-sample surveys in a community for estimation of a prevalence rate.
    Kumar R; Indrayan A
    Int J Epidemiol; 2002 Apr; 31(2):463-7. PubMed ID: 11980817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Interplay between design and analysis for behavioral intervention trials with community as the unit of randomization.
    Green SB; Corle DK; Gail MH; Mark SD; Pee D; Freedman LS; Graubard BI; Lynn WR
    Am J Epidemiol; 1995 Sep; 142(6):587-93. PubMed ID: 7653466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Sample size calculations for intervention trials in primary care randomizing by primary care group: an empirical illustration from one proposed intervention trial.
    Eldridge S; Cryer C; Feder G; Underwood M
    Stat Med; 2001 Feb; 20(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 11180307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The effects of alternative study designs on the power of community randomized trials: evidence from three studies of human immunodeficiency virus prevention in East Africa.
    Todd J; Carpenter L; Li X; Nakiyingi J; Gray R; Hayes R
    Int J Epidemiol; 2003 Oct; 32(5):755-62. PubMed ID: 14559745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Improving population-level maternal health: a hard nut to crack? Long term findings and reflections on a 16-community randomised trial in Australia to improve maternal emotional and physical health after birth [ISRCTN03464021].
    Small R; Watson L; Gunn J; Mitchell C; Brown S
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88457. PubMed ID: 24586327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Randomization inference for balanced cluster-randomized trials.
    Raab GM; Butcher I
    Clin Trials; 2005; 2(2):130-40. PubMed ID: 16279135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. PRISM: mounting a community-randomised trial. Establishing partnerships with local government.
    Small R; Brown S; Dawson W; Watson L; Lumley J
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2004 Oct; 28(5):471-5. PubMed ID: 15707190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Balancing Contamination and Referral Bias in a Randomized Clinical Trial: An Application of Pseudo-Cluster Randomization.
    Pence BW; Gaynes BN; Thielman NM; Heine A; Mugavero MJ; Turner EL; Quinlivan EB
    Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 182(12):1039-46. PubMed ID: 26628511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Pseudo cluster randomization: balancing the disadvantages of cluster and individual randomization.
    Melis RJ; Teerenstra S; Olde Rikkert MG; Borm GF
    Eval Health Prof; 2011 Jun; 34(2):151-63. PubMed ID: 20457714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Aspects of statistical design for the Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT).
    Gail MH; Byar DP; Pechacek TF; Corle DK
    Control Clin Trials; 1992 Feb; 13(1):6-21. PubMed ID: 1315664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Balancing science and community concerns in resource-limited settings: Project Accept in rural Zimbabwe.
    Chingono A; Lane T; Chitumba A; Kulich M; Morin S
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(3):273-6. PubMed ID: 18559417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The design features and practicalities of conducting a pragmatic cluster randomized trial of obesity management in primary care.
    Moore H; Summerbell C; Vail A; Greenwood DC; Adamson AJ
    Stat Med; 2001 Feb; 20(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 11180304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Sample size requirement to detect an intervention effect at the end of follow-up in a longitudinal cluster randomized trial.
    Heo M; Kim Y; Xue X; Kim MY
    Stat Med; 2010 Feb; 29(3):382-90. PubMed ID: 20014353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Randomizing patients by family practice: sample size estimation, intracluster correlation and data analysis.
    Cosby RH; Howard M; Kaczorowski J; Willan AR; Sellors JW
    Fam Pract; 2003 Feb; 20(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 12509376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The efficiency of the matched-pairs design of the Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT).
    Freedman LS; Gail MH; Green SB; Corle DK
    Control Clin Trials; 1997 Apr; 18(2):131-9. PubMed ID: 9129857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The advantages of community-randomized trials for evaluating lifestyle modification.
    Green SB
    Control Clin Trials; 1997 Dec; 18(6):506-13; discussion 514-6. PubMed ID: 9408714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.