These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15157903)

  • 1. Routine measurement of erythemally effective UV irradiance on inclined surfaces.
    Oppenrieder A; Hoeppe P; Koepke P
    J Photochem Photobiol B; 2004 May; 74(2-3):85-94. PubMed ID: 15157903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality assurance and quality control methodologies used within the Austrian UV monitoring network.
    Mario B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(4):359-62. PubMed ID: 15550702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitivity of UV erythemally effective irradiance and daily dose to spatial variability in total ozone.
    Schmalwieser AW; Erbertseder T; Schauberger G; Weihs P
    Photochem Photobiol; 2008; 84(5):1149-63. PubMed ID: 18248500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity of erythemally effective UV irradiance and daily exposure to temporal variability in total ozone.
    Schmalwieser AW; Erbertseder T; Schauberger G; Weihs P
    Photochem Photobiol; 2009; 85(1):261-71. PubMed ID: 18764894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Global forecast model to predict the daily dose of the solar erythemally effective UV radiation.
    Schmalwieser AW; Schauberger G; Janouch M; Nunez M; Koskela T; Berger D; Karamanian G
    Photochem Photobiol; 2005; 81(1):154-62. PubMed ID: 15453822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhanced UV exposure on a ski-field compared with exposures at sea level.
    Allen M; McKenzie R
    Photochem Photobiol Sci; 2005 May; 4(5):429-37. PubMed ID: 15875076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between UVB and erythemally weighted radiation.
    McKenzie R; Smale D; Kotkamp M
    Photochem Photobiol Sci; 2004 Mar; 3(3):252-6. PubMed ID: 14993940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Direct comparison between the angular distributions of the erythemal and eye-damaging UV irradiances: a pilot study.
    Schouten P; Parisi AV
    J Photochem Photobiol B; 2011 Feb; 102(2):146-55. PubMed ID: 21112218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visualization of UV exposure of the human body based on data from a scanning UV-measuring system.
    Hoeppe P; Oppenrieder A; Erianto C; Koepke P; Reuder J; Seefeldner M; Nowak D
    Int J Biometeorol; 2004 Sep; 49(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 15232726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the relationship between erythemal and vitamin D action spectrum weighted ultraviolet radiation.
    Fioletov VE; McArthur LJ; Mathews TW; Marrett L
    J Photochem Photobiol B; 2009 Apr; 95(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 19150601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scattered ultraviolet radiation underneath a shade-cloth.
    Wong CF
    Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 1994 Oct; 10(5):221-4. PubMed ID: 7880763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality assurance of solar UV irradiance in the Arctic.
    Gröbner J; Hülsen G; Wuttke S; Schrems O; De Simone S; Gallo V; Rafanelli C; Petkov B; Vitale V; Edvardsen K; Stebel K
    Photochem Photobiol Sci; 2010 Mar; 9(3):384-91. PubMed ID: 20221466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. UV hazard on Italian Apennines under different shading and ground cover conditions during peak tourist seasons of the year.
    Grifoni D; Carreras G; Sabatini F; Zipoli G
    Int J Environ Health Res; 2006 Dec; 16(6):427-37. PubMed ID: 17164169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Applicability of the polysulphone horizontal calibration to differently inclined dosimeters.
    Casale GR; Siani AM; Diémoz H; Kimlin MG; Colosimo A
    Photochem Photobiol; 2012; 88(1):207-14. PubMed ID: 21978150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Action spectrum conversion factors that change erythemally weighted to previtamin D3-weighted UV doses.
    Pope SJ; Holick MF; Mackin S; Godar DE
    Photochem Photobiol; 2008; 84(5):1277-83. PubMed ID: 18513232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. UV radiation: balancing risks and benefits.
    McKenzie RL; Liley JB; Björn LO
    Photochem Photobiol; 2009; 85(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 18657052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultraviolet radiation exposure pattern in winter compared with summer based on time-stamped personal dosimeter readings.
    Thieden E; Philipsen PA; Wulf HC
    Br J Dermatol; 2006 Jan; 154(1):133-8. PubMed ID: 16403106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. UV radiation and skin cancer in Norway.
    Medhaug I; Olseth JA; Reuder J
    J Photochem Photobiol B; 2009 Sep; 96(3):232-41. PubMed ID: 19628404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Geographical differences in erythemally-weighted UV measured at mid-latitude USDA sites.
    McKenzie R; Bodeker G; Scott G; Slusser J; Lantz K
    Photochem Photobiol Sci; 2006 Mar; 5(3):343-52. PubMed ID: 16520871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A critical assessment of two types of personal UV dosimeters.
    Seckmeyer G; Klingebiel M; Riechelmann S; Lohse I; McKenzie RL; Liley JB; Allen MW; Siani AM; Casale GR
    Photochem Photobiol; 2012; 88(1):215-22. PubMed ID: 22017203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.