These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15158008)

  • 1. The human pulvinar and attentional processing of visual distractors.
    Michael GA; Desmedt S
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 May; 362(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 15158008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Increased attentional demands impair contralesional space awareness following stroke.
    Bonato M; Priftis K; Marenzi R; Umiltà C; Zorzi M
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Nov; 48(13):3934-40. PubMed ID: 20801136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attentional effects of noradrenaline vary with arousal level: selective activation of thalamic pulvinar in humans.
    Coull JT; Jones ME; Egan TD; Frith CD; Maze M
    Neuroimage; 2004 May; 22(1):315-22. PubMed ID: 15110021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Processing capacity in chronic pain patients: a visual event-related potentials study.
    Veldhuijzen DS; Kenemans JL; van Wijck AJ; Olivier B; Kalkman CJ; Volkerts ER
    Pain; 2006 Mar; 121(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 16480825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The inferior temporal lobe mediates distracter-resistant visual search of patients with spatial neglect.
    Ptak R; Valenza N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 May; 17(5):788-99. PubMed ID: 15904545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Oculomotor integration in patients with a pulvinar lesion.
    Van der Stigchel S; Arend I; van Koningsbruggen MG; Rafal RD
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Oct; 48(12):3497-504. PubMed ID: 20691714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Central perceptual load does not reduce ipsilesional flanker interference in parietal extinction.
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychology; 2008 May; 22(3):371-82. PubMed ID: 18444715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attentional responses to unattended stimuli in human parietal cortex.
    Vandenberghe R; Geeraerts S; Molenberghs P; Lafosse C; Vandenbulcke M; Peeters K; Peeters R; Van Hecke P; Orban GA
    Brain; 2005 Dec; 128(Pt 12):2843-57. PubMed ID: 15857928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clumping distractors around the target facilitates performance on the visual search task in the elderly.
    Levinoff EJ; Rekkas PV; Murtha S
    Brain Cogn; 2002; 48(2-3):442-6. PubMed ID: 12030485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An object-based frame of reference within the human pulvinar.
    Ward R; Arend I
    Brain; 2007 Sep; 130(Pt 9):2462-9. PubMed ID: 17704525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Primary visual cortex reflects behavioral performance in the attentional blink.
    Stein T; Vallines I; Schneider WX
    Neuroreport; 2008 Aug; 19(13):1277-81. PubMed ID: 18695507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repetition of distractor sets improves visual search performance in hemispatial neglect.
    Saevarsson S; Jóelsdóttir S; Hjaltason H; Kristjánsson A
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Mar; 46(4):1161-9. PubMed ID: 18068736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The thalamus interrupts top-down attentional control for permitting exploratory shiftings to sensory signals.
    Michael GA; Boucart M; Degreef JF; Godefroy O
    Neuroreport; 2001 Jul; 12(9):2041-8. PubMed ID: 11435943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dissociable spatial and non-spatial attentional deficits after circumscribed thalamic stroke.
    Kraft A; Irlbacher K; Finke K; Kaufmann C; Kehrer S; Liebermann D; Bundesen C; Brandt SA
    Cortex; 2015 Mar; 64():327-42. PubMed ID: 25597524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of perceptual load in neglect: rejection of ipsilesional distractors is facilitated with higher central load.
    Lavie N; Robertson IH
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2001 Oct; 13(7):867-76. PubMed ID: 11595091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The human pulvinar and stimulus-driven attentional control.
    Michael GA; Buron V
    Behav Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 119(5):1353-67. PubMed ID: 16300441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal dynamics of attentional control settings in patients with spatial neglect.
    Ptak R; Golay L
    Brain Res; 2006 May; 1092(1):190-7. PubMed ID: 16643863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional functions of parietal and frontal cortex.
    Peers PV; Ludwig CJ; Rorden C; Cusack R; Bonfiglioli C; Bundesen C; Driver J; Antoun N; Duncan J
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 Oct; 15(10):1469-84. PubMed ID: 15689522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The capacity of attention and simultaneous perception of objects: a group study of Huntington's disease patients.
    Finke K; Schneider WX; Redel P; Dose M; Kerkhoff G; Müller HJ; Bublak P
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Nov; 45(14):3272-84. PubMed ID: 17681560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.