BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15158623)

  • 1. Beyond randomised versus observational studies.
    Concato J; Horwitz RI
    Lancet; 2004 May; 363(9422):1660-1. PubMed ID: 15158623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Observational versus randomised trial evidence.
    Lawlor DA; Davey Smith G; Bruckdorfer KR; Kundu D; Ebrahim S
    Lancet; 2004 Aug 28-Sep 3; 364(9436):755. PubMed ID: 15337394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When are observational studies as credible as randomised trials?
    Vandenbroucke JP
    Lancet; 2004 May; 363(9422):1728-31. PubMed ID: 15158638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Those confounded vitamins: what can we learn from the differences between observational versus randomised trial evidence?
    Lawlor DA; Davey Smith G; Kundu D; Bruckdorfer KR; Ebrahim S
    Lancet; 2004 May; 363(9422):1724-7. PubMed ID: 15158637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Observational studies versus RCTs: what about socioeconomic factors?
    Rosén M; Axelsson S; Lindblom J
    Lancet; 2009 Jun; 373(9680):2026. PubMed ID: 19524779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Observational versus randomised trial evidence.
    Brotman DJ
    Lancet; 2004 Aug 28-Sep 3; 364(9436):757. PubMed ID: 15337397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Making inferences on treatment effects from real world data: propensity scores, confounding by indication, and other perils for the unwary in observational research.
    Freemantle N; Marston L; Walters K; Wood J; Reynolds MR; Petersen I
    BMJ; 2013 Nov; 347():f6409. PubMed ID: 24217206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data.
    Wunsch H; Linde-Zwirble WT; Angus DC
    J Crit Care; 2006 Mar; 21(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16616616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Observational versus randomised trial evidence.
    Khaw KT; Day N; Bingham S; Wareham N
    Lancet; 2004 Aug 28-Sep 3; 364(9436):753-4; author reply 754-5. PubMed ID: 15337392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the causal structure of information bias and confounding bias in randomized trials.
    Shahar E; Shahar DJ
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 15(6):1214-6. PubMed ID: 20367730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Beyond randomized controlled trials: a critical comparison of trials with nonrandomized studies.
    Sørensen HT; Lash TL; Rothman KJ
    Hepatology; 2006 Nov; 44(5):1075-82. PubMed ID: 17058242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bias in research.
    Agabegi SS; Stern PJ
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2008 May; 37(5):242-8. PubMed ID: 18587501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interpreting the results of observational research: chance is not such a fine thing.
    Brennan P; Croft P
    BMJ; 1994 Sep; 309(6956):727-30. PubMed ID: 7950528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bounds on potential risks and causal risk differences under assumptions about confounding parameters.
    Chiba Y; Sato T; Greenland S
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(28):5125-35. PubMed ID: 17525935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Introduction to observational studies: part 2.
    Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):268-9. PubMed ID: 24485743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
    Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Complementarity comes of age.
    Black N
    Transplantation; 2008 Jul; 86(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 18622273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On causation in therapeutic research: observational studies, randomised experiments and instrumental variable analysis.
    Dekkers OM
    Prev Med; 2011 Oct; 53(4-5):239-41. PubMed ID: 21864566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk factors, confounding, and the illusion of statistical control.
    Christenfeld NJ; Sloan RP; Carroll D; Greenland S
    Psychosom Med; 2004; 66(6):868-75. PubMed ID: 15564351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An assessment of quality characteristics of randomised control trials published in dental journals.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
    J Dent; 2010 Sep; 38(9):713-21. PubMed ID: 20546823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.