These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15160408)

  • 1. A simple approach to power and sample size calculations in logistic regression and Cox regression models.
    Vaeth M; Skovlund E
    Stat Med; 2004 Jun; 23(11):1781-92. PubMed ID: 15160408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sample size calculations for evaluating mediation.
    Vittinghoff E; Sen S; McCulloch CE
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):541-57. PubMed ID: 19065627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cox proportional hazards models have more statistical power than logistic regression models in cross-sectional genetic association studies.
    van der Net JB; Janssens AC; Eijkemans MJ; Kastelein JJ; Sijbrands EJ; Steyerberg EW
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2008 Sep; 16(9):1111-6. PubMed ID: 18382476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A modified approach to estimating sample size for simple logistic regression with one continuous covariate.
    Novikov I; Fund N; Freedman LS
    Stat Med; 2010 Jan; 29(1):97-107. PubMed ID: 19823978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A permutation test for inference in logistic regression with small- and moderate-sized data sets.
    Potter DM
    Stat Med; 2005 Mar; 24(5):693-708. PubMed ID: 15515134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sample size determination for logistic regression revisited.
    Demidenko E
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(18):3385-97. PubMed ID: 17149799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity and efficiency of approximation methods for tied survival times in Cox regression.
    Hertz-Picciotto I; Rockhill B
    Biometrics; 1997 Sep; 53(3):1151-6. PubMed ID: 9333345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Power analyses for correlations from clustered study designs.
    Tu XM; Kowalski J; Crits-Christoph P; Gallop R
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(15):2587-606. PubMed ID: 16025545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Penalized Cox regression analysis in the high-dimensional and low-sample size settings, with applications to microarray gene expression data.
    Gui J; Li H
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):3001-8. PubMed ID: 15814556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Power and sample size calculations for current status survival analysis.
    Williamson JM; Lin HM; Kim HY
    Stat Med; 2009 Jul; 28(15):1999-2011. PubMed ID: 19455509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Mizon-Richard encompassing test for the Cox and Aalen additive hazards models.
    Martinussen T; Aalen OO; Scheike TH
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):164-71. PubMed ID: 17608786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multilevel modelling of clustered grouped survival data using Cox regression model: an application to ART dental restorations.
    Wong MC; Lam KF; Lo EC
    Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 16143989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sample size determination for comparing several survival curves with unequal allocations.
    Halabi S; Singh B
    Stat Med; 2004 Jun; 23(11):1793-815. PubMed ID: 15160409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A regression survival model for testing the proportional hazards hypothesis.
    Quantin C; Moreau T; Asselain B; Maccario J; Lellouch J
    Biometrics; 1996 Sep; 52(3):874-85. PubMed ID: 8924576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A general approach for sample size and statistical power calculations assessing of interventions using a mixture model in the presence of detection limits.
    Nie L; Chu H; Cole SR
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2006 Oct; 27(5):483-91. PubMed ID: 16769254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A simulation study of sample size for multilevel logistic regression models.
    Moineddin R; Matheson FI; Glazier RH
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Jul; 7():34. PubMed ID: 17634107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-dimensional Cox models: the choice of penalty as part of the model building process.
    Benner A; Zucknick M; Hielscher T; Ittrich C; Mansmann U
    Biom J; 2010 Feb; 52(1):50-69. PubMed ID: 20166132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sample size calculation in survival trials accounting for time-varying relationship between noncompliance and risk of outcome event.
    Li B; Grambsch P
    Clin Trials; 2006; 3(4):349-59. PubMed ID: 17060209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Avoiding infinite estimates of time-dependent effects in small-sample survival studies.
    Heinze G; Dunkler D
    Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(30):6455-69. PubMed ID: 18816502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression.
    Vittinghoff E; McCulloch CE
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 165(6):710-8. PubMed ID: 17182981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.