357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15160408)
1. A simple approach to power and sample size calculations in logistic regression and Cox regression models.
Vaeth M; Skovlund E
Stat Med; 2004 Jun; 23(11):1781-92. PubMed ID: 15160408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sample size calculations for evaluating mediation.
Vittinghoff E; Sen S; McCulloch CE
Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):541-57. PubMed ID: 19065627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cox proportional hazards models have more statistical power than logistic regression models in cross-sectional genetic association studies.
van der Net JB; Janssens AC; Eijkemans MJ; Kastelein JJ; Sijbrands EJ; Steyerberg EW
Eur J Hum Genet; 2008 Sep; 16(9):1111-6. PubMed ID: 18382476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A modified approach to estimating sample size for simple logistic regression with one continuous covariate.
Novikov I; Fund N; Freedman LS
Stat Med; 2010 Jan; 29(1):97-107. PubMed ID: 19823978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A permutation test for inference in logistic regression with small- and moderate-sized data sets.
Potter DM
Stat Med; 2005 Mar; 24(5):693-708. PubMed ID: 15515134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sample size determination for logistic regression revisited.
Demidenko E
Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(18):3385-97. PubMed ID: 17149799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity and efficiency of approximation methods for tied survival times in Cox regression.
Hertz-Picciotto I; Rockhill B
Biometrics; 1997 Sep; 53(3):1151-6. PubMed ID: 9333345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Power analyses for correlations from clustered study designs.
Tu XM; Kowalski J; Crits-Christoph P; Gallop R
Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(15):2587-606. PubMed ID: 16025545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Penalized Cox regression analysis in the high-dimensional and low-sample size settings, with applications to microarray gene expression data.
Gui J; Li H
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):3001-8. PubMed ID: 15814556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Power and sample size calculations for current status survival analysis.
Williamson JM; Lin HM; Kim HY
Stat Med; 2009 Jul; 28(15):1999-2011. PubMed ID: 19455509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Mizon-Richard encompassing test for the Cox and Aalen additive hazards models.
Martinussen T; Aalen OO; Scheike TH
Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):164-71. PubMed ID: 17608786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multilevel modelling of clustered grouped survival data using Cox regression model: an application to ART dental restorations.
Wong MC; Lam KF; Lo EC
Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 16143989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sample size determination for comparing several survival curves with unequal allocations.
Halabi S; Singh B
Stat Med; 2004 Jun; 23(11):1793-815. PubMed ID: 15160409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A regression survival model for testing the proportional hazards hypothesis.
Quantin C; Moreau T; Asselain B; Maccario J; Lellouch J
Biometrics; 1996 Sep; 52(3):874-85. PubMed ID: 8924576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A general approach for sample size and statistical power calculations assessing of interventions using a mixture model in the presence of detection limits.
Nie L; Chu H; Cole SR
Contemp Clin Trials; 2006 Oct; 27(5):483-91. PubMed ID: 16769254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A simulation study of sample size for multilevel logistic regression models.
Moineddin R; Matheson FI; Glazier RH
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Jul; 7():34. PubMed ID: 17634107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High-dimensional Cox models: the choice of penalty as part of the model building process.
Benner A; Zucknick M; Hielscher T; Ittrich C; Mansmann U
Biom J; 2010 Feb; 52(1):50-69. PubMed ID: 20166132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sample size calculation in survival trials accounting for time-varying relationship between noncompliance and risk of outcome event.
Li B; Grambsch P
Clin Trials; 2006; 3(4):349-59. PubMed ID: 17060209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Avoiding infinite estimates of time-dependent effects in small-sample survival studies.
Heinze G; Dunkler D
Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(30):6455-69. PubMed ID: 18816502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression.
Vittinghoff E; McCulloch CE
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 165(6):710-8. PubMed ID: 17182981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
