BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15160408)

  • 21. Sample size calculations in the presence of competing risks.
    Latouche A; Porcher R
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5370-80. PubMed ID: 17955563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reformulating the hazard ratio to enhance communication with clinical investigators.
    Moser BK; McCann MH
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(3):248-52. PubMed ID: 18559414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Power and sample size calculations for discrete bounded outcome scores.
    Tsonaka R; Rizopoulos D; Lesaffre E
    Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(24):4241-52. PubMed ID: 16947202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A simple test for independent censoring under the proportional hazards model.
    Lee SY; Wolfe RA
    Biometrics; 1998 Sep; 54(3):1176-82. PubMed ID: 9840972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Randomized controlled trials with time-to-event outcomes: how much does prespecified covariate adjustment increase power?
    Hernández AV; Eijkemans MJ; Steyerberg EW
    Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Jan; 16(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 16275011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparing proportional hazards and accelerated failure time models for survival analysis.
    Orbe J; Ferreira E; Núñez-Antón V
    Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(22):3493-510. PubMed ID: 12407686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparing two crossing hazard rates by Cox proportional hazards modelling.
    Liu K; Qiu P; Sheng J
    Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(2):375-91. PubMed ID: 16538703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Relative risk estimation and inference using a generalized logrank statistic.
    Mehrotra DV; Roth AJ
    Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(14):2099-113. PubMed ID: 11439424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Generating survival times to simulate Cox proportional hazards models.
    Bender R; Augustin T; Blettner M
    Stat Med; 2005 Jun; 24(11):1713-23. PubMed ID: 15724232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A practical approach to computing power for generalized linear models with nominal, count, or ordinal responses.
    Lyles RH; Lin HM; Williamson JM
    Stat Med; 2007 Mar; 26(7):1632-48. PubMed ID: 16817148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The estimation of average hazard ratios by weighted Cox regression.
    Schemper M; Wakounig S; Heinze G
    Stat Med; 2009 Aug; 28(19):2473-89. PubMed ID: 19472308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bayesian approach to average power calculations for binary regression models with misclassified outcomes.
    Cheng D; Stamey JD; Branscum AJ
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(5):848-63. PubMed ID: 19061210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A log-rank test for equivalence of two survivor functions.
    Wellek S
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):877-81. PubMed ID: 8241376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dealing with competing risks: testing covariates and calculating sample size.
    Pintilie M
    Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(22):3317-24. PubMed ID: 12407674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Validation and updating of predictive logistic regression models: a study on sample size and shrinkage.
    Steyerberg EW; Borsboom GJ; van Houwelingen HC; Eijkemans MJ; Habbema JD
    Stat Med; 2004 Aug; 23(16):2567-86. PubMed ID: 15287085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Some diagnostic methods for Cox regression models through hazard smoothing.
    Gray RJ
    Biometrics; 1990 Mar; 46(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 2190638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A practical comparison of blinded methods for sample size reviews in survival data clinical trials.
    Todd S; Valdés-Márquez E; West J
    Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 22337635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of Cox's model and logistic regression for matched case-control data with time-dependent covariates: a simulation study.
    Leffondré K; Abrahamowicz M; Siemiatycki J
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3781-94. PubMed ID: 14673938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Performance of using multiple stepwise algorithms for variable selection.
    Wiegand RE
    Stat Med; 2010 Jul; 29(15):1647-59. PubMed ID: 20552568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Flexible two-stage design with sample size reassessment for survival trials.
    Desseaux K; Porcher R
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):5002-13. PubMed ID: 17577242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.