These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15161378)

  • 21. Processing fluency of the forms and sounds of Chinese characters.
    Liu S; Zhang X; Ren Y; Yu Q
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Jun; 20(2):191-203. PubMed ID: 20621523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Auditory-visual integration for speech by children with and without specific language impairment.
    Norrix LW; Plante E; Vance R; Boliek CA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Dec; 50(6):1639-51. PubMed ID: 18055778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of the McGurk effect for spoken and sung syllables.
    Quinto L; Thompson WF; Russo FA; Trehub SE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1450-4. PubMed ID: 20675792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Time course of early audiovisual interactions during speech and nonspeech central auditory processing: a magnetoencephalography study.
    Hertrich I; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W; Ackermann H
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 21(2):259-74. PubMed ID: 18510440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The relation of phoneme discrimination, lexical access, and short-term memory: A case study and interactive activation account.
    Martin RC; Breedin SD; Damian MF
    Brain Lang; 1999 Dec; 70(3):437-82. PubMed ID: 10600229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The McGurk effect in children with autism and Asperger syndrome.
    Bebko JM; Schroeder JH; Weiss JA
    Autism Res; 2014 Feb; 7(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 24136870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Contributions of oral and extraoral facial movement to visual and audiovisual speech perception.
    Thomas SM; Jordan TR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):873-88. PubMed ID: 15462626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A role for the inferior colliculus in multisensory speech integration.
    Champoux F; Tremblay C; Mercier C; Lassonde M; Lepore F; Gagné JP; Théoret H
    Neuroreport; 2006 Oct; 17(15):1607-10. PubMed ID: 17001277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Binding and unbinding the auditory and visual streams in the McGurk effect.
    Nahorna O; Berthommier F; Schwartz JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1061-77. PubMed ID: 22894226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Temporal constraints on the McGurk effect.
    Munhall KG; Gribble P; Sacco L; Ward M
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Apr; 58(3):351-62. PubMed ID: 8935896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Imitation during phoneme production.
    Gentilucci M; Bernardis P
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):608-15. PubMed ID: 16698051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Phonological processing in deaf children: when lipreading and cues are incongruent.
    Alegria J; Lechat J
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2005; 10(2):122-33. PubMed ID: 15778209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. When half a face is as good as a whole: effects of simple substantial occlusion on visual and audiovisual speech perception.
    Jordan TR; Thomas SM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2270-85. PubMed ID: 21842332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prelexical facilitation and lexical interference in auditory word recognition.
    Slowiaczek LM; Hamburger M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Nov; 18(6):1239-50. PubMed ID: 1447549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perception of intersensory synchrony in audiovisual speech: not that special.
    Vroomen J; Stekelenburg JJ
    Cognition; 2011 Jan; 118(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 21035795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of selective attention to auditory and visual speech on the integration of audiovisual speech information.
    Buchan JN; Munhall KG
    Perception; 2011; 40(10):1164-82. PubMed ID: 22308887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The developmental turnpoint of orthographic consistency effects in speech recognition.
    Ventura P; Kolinsky R; Pattamadilok C; Morais J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2008 Jun; 100(2):135-45. PubMed ID: 18328498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Amodal processing of visual speech as revealed by priming.
    Kim J; Davis C; Krins P
    Cognition; 2004 Aug; 93(1):B39-47. PubMed ID: 15110729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessing automaticity in audiovisual speech integration: evidence from the speeded classification task.
    Soto-Faraco S; Navarra J; Alsius A
    Cognition; 2004 Jul; 92(3):B13-23. PubMed ID: 15019556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.