These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15161380)

  • 1. Pictorial and conceptual representation of glimpsed pictures.
    Potter MC; Staub A; O'Connor DH; Potter MC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Jun; 30(3):478-89. PubMed ID: 15161380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Short-term conceptual memory for pictures.
    Potter MC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1976 Sep; 2(5):509-22. PubMed ID: 1003124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Presentation rate and the representation of briefly glimpsed pictures in memory.
    Intraub H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 Jan; 6(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 7373241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Revisiting the picture-superiority effect in symbolic comparisons: do pictures provide privileged access?
    Amrhein PC; McDaniel MA; Waddill P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):843-57. PubMed ID: 12219794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pictorial superiority effect.
    Nelson DL; Reed VS; Walling JR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1976 Sep; 2(5):523-8. PubMed ID: 1003125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The representation of pictures in memory.
    McKoon G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1981 May; 7(3):216-21. PubMed ID: 7241061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recognition memory for briefly presented pictures: the time course of rapid forgetting.
    Potter MC; Staub A; Rado J; O'Connor DH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Oct; 28(5):1163-75. PubMed ID: 12421062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recognition latency for pictures and words as a function of encoded-feature similarity.
    Bencomo AA; Daniel TC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1975 Mar; 104(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 1141826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The attention cascade model and attentional blink.
    Shih SI
    Cogn Psychol; 2008 May; 56(3):210-36. PubMed ID: 17624321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: visual working memory content affects visual attention.
    Olivers CN; Meijer F; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Oct; 32(5):1243-65. PubMed ID: 17002535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bimodal format effects in working memory.
    Goolkasian P; Foos PW
    Am J Psychol; 2005; 118(1):61-77. PubMed ID: 15822610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The functional visual field during picture viewing.
    Nelson WW; Loftus GR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 Jul; 6(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 7391754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Picture recognition without picture identification: a method for assessing the role of perceptual information in familiarity-based picture recognition.
    Langley MM; Cleary AM; Kostic BN; Woods JA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 17434434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Failing to get the gist: reduced false recognition of semantic associates in semantic dementia.
    Simons JS; Verfaellie M; Hodges JR; Lee AC; Graham KS; Koutstaal W; Schacter DL; Budson AE
    Neuropsychology; 2005 May; 19(3):353-61. PubMed ID: 15910121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of label distinctiveness and label testing on recognition of complex pictures.
    Bartlett JC; Till RE; Fields WC
    Am J Psychol; 1980 Sep; 93(3):505-27. PubMed ID: 7212128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recognition memory for pictorial stimuli: biasing effects of stimulus emotionality.
    Fernández-Rey J; Redondo J
    Psicothema; 2007 Aug; 19(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 17617973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Memory for descriptive and spatial information in complex pictures.
    Mandler JM; Parker RE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1976 Jan; 2(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 1249532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selective attention affects implicit and explicit memory for familiar pictures at different delay conditions.
    Ballesteros S; Reales JM; García E; Carrasco M
    Psicothema; 2006 Feb; 18(1):88-99. PubMed ID: 17296015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Some of the thousand words a picture is worth.
    Mandler JM; Johnson NS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1976 Sep; 2(5):529-40. PubMed ID: 1003126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Memory scanning of organized visual material.
    DeRosa DV; Tkacz S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1976 Nov; 2(6):688-94. PubMed ID: 1010991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.