These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
556 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15161387)
1. The costs of changing the representation of action: response repetition and response-response compatibility in dual tasks. Schuch S; Koch I; Schuch S J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Jun; 30(3):566-82. PubMed ID: 15161387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Response-repetition effects in task switching with and without response execution. Schuch S; Koch I Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Nov; 135(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 20719288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dual-task performance with ideomotor-compatible tasks: is the central processing bottleneck intact, bypassed, or shifted in locus? Lien MC; McCann RS; Ruthruff E; Proctor RW J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Feb; 31(1):122-44. PubMed ID: 15709868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fractionating the cognitive control required to bring about a change in task: a dense-sensor event-related potential study. Astle DE; Jackson GM; Swainson R J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 20(2):255-67. PubMed ID: 18275333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An effect of spatial-temporal association of response codes: understanding the cognitive representations of time. Vallesi A; Binns MA; Shallice T Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):501-27. PubMed ID: 18076872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dual-task crosstalk between saccades and manual responses. Huestegge L; Koch I J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):352-62. PubMed ID: 19331493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of task instruction on action coding: constraint setting or direct coding? Wenke D; Frensch PA J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Aug; 31(4):803-19. PubMed ID: 16131251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Action-effect codes in and before the central bottleneck: evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. Paelecke M; Kunde W J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Jun; 33(3):627-44. PubMed ID: 17563226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are spatial responses to visuospatial stimuli and spoken responses to auditory letters ideomotor-compatible tasks? Examination of set-size effects on dual-task interference. Shin YK; Proctor RW Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):352-64. PubMed ID: 18845280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Parallel response selection disrupts sequence learning under dual-task conditions. Schumacher EH; Schwarb H J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 May; 138(2):270-90. PubMed ID: 19397384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dissociating neural indices of dynamic cognitive control in advance task-set preparation: an ERP study of task switching. Astle DE; Jackson GM; Swainson R Brain Res; 2006 Dec; 1125(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 17087918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Increased neural efficiency with repeated performance of a working memory task is information-type dependent. Sayala S; Sala JB; Courtney SM Cereb Cortex; 2006 May; 16(5):609-17. PubMed ID: 16079245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dissociating cue-related and task-related processes in task inhibition: evidence from using a 2:1 cue-to-task mapping. Gade M; Koch I Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Mar; 62(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 18473629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]