BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

33 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15161390)

  • 1. Blink and shrink: the effect of the attentional blink on spatial processing.
    Olivers CN; Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Jun; 30(3):613-31. PubMed ID: 15161390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attentional and perceptual factors affecting the attentional blink for faces and objects.
    Landau AN; Bentin S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):818-30. PubMed ID: 18665728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. No effect of hunger on attentional capture by food cues: Two replication studies.
    Neal C; Pepper GV; Allen C; Nettle D
    Appetite; 2023 Dec; 191():107065. PubMed ID: 37774843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attentional blur and blink: Effects of adaptive attentional scaling on visual awareness.
    Wang S; Karabay A; Akyürek EG
    Conscious Cogn; 2024 Jan; 117():103627. PubMed ID: 38157820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Slippage of the attentional beam when searching in space and in time.
    Klein RM; Ishigami Y; Murray NE
    Cognition; 2023 Dec; 241():105610. PubMed ID: 37778283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Whole Report versus Partial Report in RSVP Sentences.
    Potter MC; Nieuwenstein M; Strohminger N
    J Mem Lang; 2008 May; 58(4):907-915. PubMed ID: 18568099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implied Spatial Meaning and Visuospatial Bias: Conceptual Processing Influences Processing of Visual Targets and Distractors.
    Gozli DG; Pratt J; Martin KZ; Chasteen AL
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150928. PubMed ID: 26953570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Voluntary attention enhances contrast appearance.
    Liu T; Abrams J; Carrasco M
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Mar; 20(3):354-62. PubMed ID: 19254239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Blink Rate Patterns Provide a Reliable Measure of Individual Engagement with Scene Content.
    Ranti C; Jones W; Klin A; Shultz S
    Sci Rep; 2020 May; 10(1):8267. PubMed ID: 32427957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporal variability predicts the magnitude of between-group attentional blink differences in developmental dyslexia: a meta-analysis.
    Badcock NA; Kidd JC
    PeerJ; 2015; 3():e746. PubMed ID: 25649715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High target prevalence may reduce the spread of attention during search tasks.
    Pinto JDG; Papesh MH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Jan; 86(1):62-83. PubMed ID: 38036870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Plasticity of visual attention in Isha yoga meditation practitioners before and after a 3-month retreat.
    Braboszcz C; Cahn BR; Balakrishnan B; Maturi RK; Grandchamp R; Delorme A
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():914. PubMed ID: 24376429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attention as inference: selection is probabilistic; responses are all-or-none samples.
    Vul E; Hanus D; Kanwisher N
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Nov; 138(4):546-60. PubMed ID: 19883136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceived Duration Depends Upon Target Detection in Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Sequence.
    Ichikawa M; Miyoshi M
    Iperception; 2020; 11(6):2041669520981996. PubMed ID: 33489076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pitch Improvement in Attentional Blink: A Study across Audiovisual Asymmetries.
    Yang H; Cai B; Tan W; Luo L; Zhang Z
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2024 Feb; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 38392498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Looking at reality versus watching screens: Media professionalization effects on the spontaneous eyeblink rate.
    Andreu-Sánchez C; Martín-Pascual MÁ; Gruart A; Delgado-García JM
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0176030. PubMed ID: 28467449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nudging the N170 forward with prior stimulation-Bridging the gap between N170 and recognition potential.
    Luo C; Chen W; VanRullen R; Zhang Y; Gaspar CM
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2022 Mar; 43(4):1214-1230. PubMed ID: 34786780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporal characteristics of the effects of visual pattern redundancy on encoding and storage processes: evidence from rapid serial visual presentation.
    Takahashi J; Hidaka S; Teramoto W; Gyoba J
    Psychol Res; 2013 Nov; 77(6):687-97. PubMed ID: 23344902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial distribution of the attentional blink.
    Du F; Abrams RA; Zhang K
    Front Psychol; 2011; 2():360. PubMed ID: 22162972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differential effects of exogenous and endogenous cueing in multi-stream RSVP: implications for theories of attentional blink.
    Zhang D; Shao L; Zhou X; Martens S
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Sep; 205(3):415-22. PubMed ID: 20686889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.