These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15161412)

  • 1. A counterintuitive hypothesis about employment interview validity and some supporting evidence.
    Schmidt FL; Zimmerman RD
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Jun; 89(3):553-61. PubMed ID: 15161412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The staff nurse employment interview: predicting performance outcomes. Part II.
    Heslin KA; Faux SA
    Can J Nurs Adm; 1991; 4(4):30-6. PubMed ID: 1747381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Faking and the validity of conscientiousness: a Monte Carlo investigation.
    Komar S; Brown DJ; Komar JA; Robie C
    J Appl Psychol; 2008 Jan; 93(1):140-54. PubMed ID: 18211141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What you see may not be what you get: relationships among self-presentation tactics and ratings of interview and job performance.
    Barrick MR; Shaffer JA; DeGrassi SW
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Nov; 94(6):1394-411. PubMed ID: 19916651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing personality with a structured employment interview: construct-related validity and susceptibility to response inflation.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Raymark PH; Roth PL
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 May; 90(3):536-52. PubMed ID: 15910148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Positive manifold limits the relevance of content-matching strategies for validating selection test batteries.
    Murphy KR; Dzieweczynski JL; Zhang Y
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Jul; 94(4):1018-31. PubMed ID: 19594241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medical student selection: choice of a semi-structured panel interview or an unstructured one-on-one interview.
    Ann Courneya C; Wright K; Frinton V; Mak E; Schulzer M; Pachev G
    Med Teach; 2005 Sep; 27(6):499-503. PubMed ID: 16199355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is there a general factor in ratings of job performance? A meta-analytic framework for disentangling substantive and error influences.
    Viswesvaran C; Schmidt FL; Ones DS
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Jan; 90(1):108-31. PubMed ID: 15641893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of person-organization fit in employment decision making: an assessment of its criterion-related validity.
    Arthur W; Bell ST; Villado AJ; Doverspike D
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 Jul; 91(4):786-801. PubMed ID: 16834506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An application of the situational interview to selection of nursing personnel.
    Jone KY; Yu L; Yuan HS
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2000 Sep; 16(9):476-85. PubMed ID: 11271733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are you interested? A meta-analysis of relations between vocational interests and employee performance and turnover.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Roth PL; Putka DJ; Lanivich SE
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Nov; 96(6):1167-94. PubMed ID: 21744941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of job complexity and performance measurement on the temporal consistency, stability, and test-retest reliability of employee job performance ratings.
    Sturman MC; Cheramie RA; Cashen LH
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Mar; 90(2):269-83. PubMed ID: 15769237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Initial evaluations in the interview: relationships with subsequent interviewer evaluations and employment offers.
    Barrick MR; Swider BW; Stewart GL
    J Appl Psychol; 2010 Nov; 95(6):1163-72. PubMed ID: 20718533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Study of structured selection interviews at a Japanese corporation].
    Takeda T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2004 Oct; 75(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 15747554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring faking in the employment interview: development and validation of an interview faking behavior scale.
    Levashina J; Campion MA
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Nov; 92(6):1638-56. PubMed ID: 18020802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conditional reliability of admissions interview ratings: extreme ratings are the most informative.
    Stansfield RB; Kreiter CD
    Med Educ; 2007 Jan; 41(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 17209890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Medical school application interview score has limited predictive validity for performance on a fourth year clinical practice examination.
    Basco WT; Lancaster CJ; Gilbert GE; Carey ME; Blue AV
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 May; 13(2):151-62. PubMed ID: 17089077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling error variance in job specification ratings: the influence of rater, job, and organization-level factors.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Putka DJ; Raymark PH; Eidson CE
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Mar; 90(2):323-34. PubMed ID: 15769241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A meta-analytic study of general mental ability validity for different occupations in the European community.
    Salgado JF; Anderson N; Moscoso S; Bertua C; de Fruyt F; Rolland JP
    J Appl Psychol; 2003 Dec; 88(6):1068-81. PubMed ID: 14640817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of corrections for faking on the validity of noncognitive measures in selection settings.
    Schmitt N; Oswald FL
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 May; 91(3):613-21. PubMed ID: 16737358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.