1010 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15161896)
1. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles.
Chan AW; Hróbjartsson A; Haahr MT; Gøtzsche PC; Altman DG
JAMA; 2004 May; 291(20):2457-65. PubMed ID: 15161896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Chan AW; Krleza-Jerić K; Schmid I; Altman DG
CMAJ; 2004 Sep; 171(7):735-40. PubMed ID: 15451835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Selective reporting of positive outcomes in randomised trials--secondary publication.. A comparison of protocols with published reports].
Hróbjartsson A; Chan AW; Haahr MT; Gøtzsche PC; Altman DG
Ugeskr Laeger; 2005 Aug; 167(34):3189-91. PubMed ID: 16117920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials of Orthopaedic Surgical Interventions.
Rongen JJ; Hannink G
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Mar; 98(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 26935463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Empirical evidence for outcome reporting bias in randomized clinical trials of acupuncture: comparison of registered records and subsequent publications.
Su CX; Han M; Ren J; Li WY; Yue SJ; Hao YF; Liu JP
Trials; 2015 Jan; 16():28. PubMed ID: 25626862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors.
Chan AW; Altman DG
BMJ; 2005 Apr; 330(7494):753. PubMed ID: 15681569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials.
Dwan K; Altman DG; Cresswell L; Blundell M; Gamble CL; Williamson PR
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Jan; 2011(1):MR000031. PubMed ID: 21249714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between publicly accessible publications, registries, and protocols of phase III trials indicated persistence of selective outcome reporting.
Zhang S; Liang F; Li W
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Nov; 91():87-94. PubMed ID: 28757260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trial registration as a safeguard against outcome reporting bias and spin? A case study of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture.
Won J; Kim S; Bae I; Lee H
PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223305. PubMed ID: 31581278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of noninferiority margins reported in protocols and publications showed incomplete and inconsistent reporting.
Dekkers OM; Cevallos M; Bührer J; Poncet A; Ackermann Rau S; Perneger TV; Egger M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 May; 68(5):510-7. PubMed ID: 25450451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials.
Mathieu S; Boutron I; Moher D; Altman DG; Ravaud P
JAMA; 2009 Sep; 302(9):977-84. PubMed ID: 19724045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized clinical trials of surgical interventions.
Hannink G; Gooszen HG; Rovers MM
Ann Surg; 2013 May; 257(5):818-23. PubMed ID: 23407296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialists.
Smyth RM; Kirkham JJ; Jacoby A; Altman DG; Gamble C; Williamson PR
BMJ; 2011 Jan; 342():c7153. PubMed ID: 21212122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Selective reporting bias due to discrepancies between registered and published outcomes in osteoarthritis trials.
Krsticevic M; Saric D; Saric F; Slapnicar E; Boric K; Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Kegalj MJ; Puljak L
J Comp Eff Res; 2019 Nov; 8(15):1265-1273. PubMed ID: 31739691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Registration rates, adequacy of registration, and a comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials published in surgery journals.
Killeen S; Sourallous P; Hunter IA; Hartley JE; Grady HL
Ann Surg; 2014 Jan; 259(1):193-6. PubMed ID: 23732270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcome reporting in industry-sponsored trials of gabapentin for off-label use.
Vedula SS; Bero L; Scherer RW; Dickersin K
N Engl J Med; 2009 Nov; 361(20):1963-71. PubMed ID: 19907043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Registered and Reported Outcomes in Randomized Clinical Trials Published in Anesthesiology Journals.
Jones PM; Chow JTY; Arango MF; Fridfinnson JA; Gai N; Lam K; Turkstra TP
Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1292-1300. PubMed ID: 28704247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reporting Bias in Clinical Trials Investigating the Efficacy of Second-Generation Antidepressants in the Treatment of Anxiety Disorders: A Report of 2 Meta-analyses.
Roest AM; de Jonge P; Williams CD; de Vries YA; Schoevers RA; Turner EH
JAMA Psychiatry; 2015 May; 72(5):500-10. PubMed ID: 25806940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cohort study of trials submitted to ethics committee identified discrepant reporting of outcomes in publications.
Redmond S; von Elm E; Blümle A; Gengler M; Gsponer T; Egger M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Dec; 66(12):1367-75. PubMed ID: 24075598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias.
Dwan K; Altman DG; Arnaiz JA; Bloom J; Chan AW; Cronin E; Decullier E; Easterbrook PJ; Von Elm E; Gamble C; Ghersi D; Ioannidis JP; Simes J; Williamson PR
PLoS One; 2008 Aug; 3(8):e3081. PubMed ID: 18769481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
