113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15162028)
1. Quantitative analysis of radiation-induced chromosome aberrations.
Sachs RK; Levy D; Hahnfeldt P; Hlatky L
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2004; 104(1-4):142-8. PubMed ID: 15162028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Models of chromosome aberration induction: an example based on radiation track structure.
Ballarini F; Ottolenghi A
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2004; 104(1-4):149-56. PubMed ID: 15162029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computer analysis of mFISH chromosome aberration data uncovers an excess of very complicated metaphases.
Vazquez M; Greulich-Bode KM; Arsuaga J; Cornforth MN; Brückner M; Sachs RK; Hlatky L; Molls M; Hahnfeldt P
Int J Radiat Biol; 2002 Dec; 78(12):1103-15. PubMed ID: 12556338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer simulation of data on chromosome aberrations produced by X rays or alpha particles and detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Chen AM; Lucas JN; Simpson PJ; Griffin CS; Savage JR; Brenner DJ; Hlatky LR; Sachs RK
Radiat Res; 1997 Nov; 148(5 Suppl):S93-101. PubMed ID: 9355862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cell type-specific quantitative predictions of radiation-induced chromosome aberrations: a computer model approach.
Kreth G; Pazhanisamy SK; Hausmann M; Cremer C
Radiat Res; 2007 May; 167(5):515-25. PubMed ID: 17474788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Chromosome aberrations produced by ionizing radiation: Monte Carlo simulations and chromosome painting data.
Chen AM; Lucas JN; Hill FS; Brenner DJ; Sachs RK
Comput Appl Biosci; 1995 Aug; 11(4):389-97. PubMed ID: 8521048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Proximity effects for chromosome aberrations measured by FISH.
Chen AM; Lucas JN; Hill FS; Brenner DJ; Sachs RK
Int J Radiat Biol; 1996 Apr; 69(4):411-20. PubMed ID: 8627123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of dose response for radiation induced exchange aberrations taking cell cycle delays into account.
Eidelman YA; Ritter S; Nasonova E; Lee R; Talyzina TA; Andreev SG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 122(1-4):185-7. PubMed ID: 17132676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Mechanistic modelling allows to assess pathways of DNA lesion interactions underlying chromosome aberration formation].
Eĭdel'man IuA; Slanina SV; Sal'nikov IV; Andreev SG
Genetika; 2012 Dec; 48(12):1427-36. PubMed ID: 23516904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Random breakage and reunion chromosome aberration formation model; an interaction-distance version based on chromatin geometry.
Sachs RK; Levy D; Chen AM; Simpson PJ; Cornforth MN; Ingerman EA; Hahnfeldt P; Hlatky LR
Int J Radiat Biol; 2000 Dec; 76(12):1579-88. PubMed ID: 11133039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiation-induced chromosome aberrations in human peripheral lymphocytes. Exposure to X-rays or protons.
Todorov SL
Strahlentherapie; 1975 Feb; 149(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 1135889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modelling radiation-induced chromosome aberrations.
Edwards AA
Int J Radiat Biol; 2002 Jul; 78(7):551-8. PubMed ID: 12079533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationship between radiation induced dicentric chromosome aberrations and micronucleus formation in human lymphocytes.
Hatayoglu SE; Orta T
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Jun; 26(2):229-34. PubMed ID: 17725103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Algorithms for the evaluation of radiation induced chromosome aberration yields per cell from flow karyotypes.
Dietzel AH; Hain J; Virsik-Peuckert RP; Harder D
Cytometry; 1990; 11(6):708-15. PubMed ID: 2384030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differential radiation effects in smokers--culture time dependence of the yield of gamma ray-induced chromosome damage in first division metaphases.
Krishnaja AP; Sharma NK
Int J Radiat Biol; 2006 May; 82(5):363-77. PubMed ID: 16782654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dose-response prediction for radiation-induced chromosomal instability.
Andreev SG; Eidelman YA
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Feb; 143(2-4):270-3. PubMed ID: 21183543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Monte Carlo/Markov chain model for the association of data for chromosome aberrations and formation of micronuclei.
Hahnfeldt P; Hlatky LR
Radiat Res; 1994 May; 138(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 8183993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On the nature of visible chromosomal gaps and breaks.
Savage JR
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2004; 104(1-4):46-55. PubMed ID: 15162014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of radiation quality on the spectrum of induced chromosome exchange aberrations.
Boei JJ; Vermeulen S; Mullenders LH; Natarajan AT
Int J Radiat Biol; 2001 Aug; 77(8):847-57. PubMed ID: 11571018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accurate detection of true incomplete exchanges in human lymphocytes exposed to neutron radiation using chromosome painting in combination with a telomeric PNA probe.
Fomina J; Darroudi F; Natarajan AT
Int J Radiat Biol; 2001 Dec; 77(12):1175-83. PubMed ID: 11747542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
