222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15162493)
1. Hydrophobic complementarity in protein-protein docking.
Berchanski A; Shapira B; Eisenstein M
Proteins; 2004 Jul; 56(1):130-42. PubMed ID: 15162493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Examination of shape complementarity in docking of unbound proteins.
Norel R; Petrey D; Wolfson HJ; Nussinov R
Proteins; 1999 Aug; 36(3):307-17. PubMed ID: 10409824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Looking at enzymes from the inside out: the proximity of catalytic residues to the molecular centroid can be used for detection of active sites and enzyme-ligand interfaces.
Ben-Shimon A; Eisenstein M
J Mol Biol; 2005 Aug; 351(2):309-26. PubMed ID: 16019028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hydrophobic docking: a proposed enhancement to molecular recognition techniques.
Vakser IA; Aflalo C
Proteins; 1994 Dec; 20(4):320-9. PubMed ID: 7731951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Complementarity of hydrophobic properties in ATP-protein binding: a new criterion to rank docking solutions.
Pyrkov TV; Kosinsky YA; Arseniev AS; Priestle JP; Jacoby E; Efremov RG
Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):388-98. PubMed ID: 17094116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of resolution-dependent global shape modifications on rigid-body protein-protein docking.
Segal D; Eisenstein M
Proteins; 2005 May; 59(3):580-91. PubMed ID: 15778956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A novel shape complementarity scoring function for protein-protein docking.
Chen R; Weng Z
Proteins; 2003 May; 51(3):397-408. PubMed ID: 12696051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Weighted geometric docking: incorporating external information in the rotation-translation scan.
Ben-Zeev E; Eisenstein M
Proteins; 2003 Jul; 52(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 12784363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information.
Gabb HA; Jackson RM; Sternberg MJ
J Mol Biol; 1997 Sep; 272(1):106-20. PubMed ID: 9299341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adaptation of a fast Fourier transform-based docking algorithm for protein design.
Huang PS; Love JJ; Mayo SL
J Comput Chem; 2005 Sep; 26(12):1222-32. PubMed ID: 15962277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MIAX: a new paradigm for modeling biomacromolecular interactions and complex formation in condensed phases.
Del Carpio-Muñoz CA; Ichiishi E; Yoshimori A; Yoshikawa T
Proteins; 2002 Sep; 48(4):696-732. PubMed ID: 12211037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Physicochemical and residue conservation calculations to improve the ranking of protein-protein docking solutions.
Duan Y; Reddy BV; Kaznessis YN
Protein Sci; 2005 Feb; 14(2):316-28. PubMed ID: 15659366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analyses of homo-oligomer interfaces of proteins from the complementarity of molecular surface, electrostatic potential and hydrophobicity.
Tsuchiya Y; Kinoshita K; Nakamura H
Protein Eng Des Sel; 2006 Sep; 19(9):421-9. PubMed ID: 16837482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A continuum model for protein-protein interactions: application to the docking problem.
Jackson RM; Sternberg MJ
J Mol Biol; 1995 Jul; 250(2):258-75. PubMed ID: 7541840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inherent limitations in protein-protein docking procedures.
Kowalsman N; Eisenstein M
Bioinformatics; 2007 Feb; 23(4):421-6. PubMed ID: 17040920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Distribution and complementarity of hydropathy in multisubunit proteins.
Korn AP; Burnett RM
Proteins; 1991; 9(1):37-55. PubMed ID: 2017435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combining interface core and whole interface descriptors in postscan processing of protein-protein docking models.
Kowalsman N; Eisenstein M
Proteins; 2009 Nov; 77(2):297-318. PubMed ID: 19452551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrostatics in protein-protein docking.
Heifetz A; Katchalski-Katzir E; Eisenstein M
Protein Sci; 2002 Mar; 11(3):571-87. PubMed ID: 11847280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Protein docking using spherical polar Fourier correlations.
Ritchie DW; Kemp GJ
Proteins; 2000 May; 39(2):178-94. PubMed ID: 10737939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes.
Moont G; Gabb HA; Sternberg MJ
Proteins; 1999 May; 35(3):364-73. PubMed ID: 10328272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
