These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15162914)

  • 1. Topographic analysis of painful laser and sural nerve electrical evoked potentials.
    Dowman R
    Brain Topogr; 2004; 16(3):169-79. PubMed ID: 15162914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SEP topographies elicited by innocuous and noxious sural nerve stimulation. I. Identification of stable periods and individual differences.
    Dowman R
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Jul; 92(4):291-302. PubMed ID: 7517851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SEP topographies elicited by innocuous and noxious sural nerve stimulation. II. Effects of stimulus intensity on topographic pattern and amplitude.
    Dowman R
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Jul; 92(4):303-15. PubMed ID: 7517852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human intracranially-recorded cortical responses evoked by painful electrical stimulation of the sural nerve.
    Dowman R; Darcey T; Barkan H; Thadani V; Roberts D
    Neuroimage; 2007 Jan; 34(2):743-63. PubMed ID: 17097306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Amplitudes of laser evoked potential recorded from primary somatosensory, parasylvian and medial frontal cortex are graded with stimulus intensity.
    Ohara S; Crone NE; Weiss N; Treede RD; Lenz FA
    Pain; 2004 Jul; 110(1-2):318-28. PubMed ID: 15275782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cutaneous painful laser stimuli evoke responses recorded directly from primary somatosensory cortex in awake humans.
    Ohara S; Crone NE; Weiss N; Treede RD; Lenz FA
    J Neurophysiol; 2004 Jun; 91(6):2734-46. PubMed ID: 14602841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 3D topographic study of the diode laser evoked potentials (LEPs) to painful stimulation of the trigeminal sensory area.
    Durak K; Chen AC; Arendt-Nielsen L
    Brain Topogr; 2004; 16(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 15162911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural mechanisms of detecting and orienting attention toward unattended threatening somatosensory targets. I. Intermodal effects.
    Dowman R
    Psychophysiology; 2007 May; 44(3):407-19. PubMed ID: 17371498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Equivalent electrical source analysis of pain-related somatosensory evoked potentials elicited by a CO2 laser.
    Tarkka IM; Treede RD
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 Oct; 10(4):513-9. PubMed ID: 8308146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural mechanisms of detecting and orienting attention toward unattended threatening somatosensory target stimuli. II. Intensity effects.
    Dowman R
    Psychophysiology; 2007 May; 44(3):420-30. PubMed ID: 17371499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of interstimulus interval on scalp topographies evoked by noxious sural nerve stimulation.
    Dowman R
    Psychophysiology; 1996 Jul; 33(4):398-408. PubMed ID: 8753940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Topography of middle-latency somatosensory evoked potentials following painful laser stimuli and non-painful electrical stimuli.
    Kunde V; Treede RD
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(4):280-9. PubMed ID: 7688283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Innocuous-related sural nerve-evoked and finger-evoked potentials generated in the primary somatosensory and supplementary motor cortices.
    Dowman R; Schell S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Dec; 110(12):2104-16. PubMed ID: 10616115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Different modalities of painful somatosensory stimulations affect anticipatory cortical processes: a high-resolution EEG study.
    Babiloni C; Brancucci A; Capotosto P; Del Percio C; Romani GL; Arendt-Nielsen L; Rossini PM
    Brain Res Bull; 2007 Mar; 71(5):475-84. PubMed ID: 17259016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of reference sites for scalp potentials evoked by painful and non-painful sural nerve stimulation.
    Dowman R; Goshko L
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1992; 84(6):477-85. PubMed ID: 1280193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The pain-evoked P2 is not a P3a event-related potential.
    Dowman R
    Brain Topogr; 2004; 17(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 15669751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SEP topographies elicited by innocuous and noxious sural nerve stimulation. III. Dipole source localization analysis.
    Dowman R; Darcey TM
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Sep; 92(5):373-91. PubMed ID: 7523081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of the pain-evoked negative difference potential in dual-task response conflict.
    Dowman R
    Eur J Pain; 2004 Dec; 8(6):567-78. PubMed ID: 15531225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abnormal nociceptive processing occurs centrally and not peripherally in pain-free Parkinson disease patients: A study with laser-evoked potentials.
    Zambito-Marsala S; Erro R; Bacchin R; Fornasier A; Fabris F; Lo Cascio C; Ferracci F; Morgante F; Tinazzi M
    Parkinsonism Relat Disord; 2017 Jan; 34():43-48. PubMed ID: 27836714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Different neuronal contribution to N20 somatosensory evoked potential and to CO2 laser evoked potentials: an intracerebral recording study.
    Valeriani M; Barba C; Le Pera D; Restuccia D; Colicchio G; Tonali P; Gagliardo O; Treede RD
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jan; 115(1):211-6. PubMed ID: 14706490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.