These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15163152)

  • 1. Evaluation of TMJ by conventional transcranial radiography and indirect digitized images to determine condylar position in primary dentition.
    Pereira LJ; Bonjardim LR; Castelo PM; Haiter Neto F; Gavião MB
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2004; 28(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 15163152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of condylar position from temporomandibular joint radiographs.
    Aquilino SA; Matteson SR; Holland GA; Phillips C
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Jan; 53(1):88-97. PubMed ID: 3856026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing condylar changes with digital subtraction radiography.
    Kapa SF; Tyndall DA; Zullo TG; Bagnell CR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Feb; 75(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 8426725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of condylar position from transcranial projections in primary dentition.
    Serra MD; Gavião MB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 16549438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An evaluation of digital subtraction radiography for assessment of changes in position of the mandibular condyle.
    Ekberg EC; Petersson A; Nilner M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jul; 27(4):230-5. PubMed ID: 9780901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transcranial radiography and linear tomography: a comparative study.
    Knoernschild KL; Aquilino SA; Ruprecht A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Aug; 66(2):239-50. PubMed ID: 1774686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reduced joint distance during TMJ movement in the posterior condylar position.
    Yang HJ; Kim DS; Yi WJ; Hwang SJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 41(7):e159-64. PubMed ID: 23465637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A tomographic study of the mandibular condyle position in partially edentulous population.
    Ammanna S; Rodrigues A; Shetty NS; Shetty K; Augustine D; Patil S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Jan; 16(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 25876953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A method for quantifying positional change of the condyle on lateral tomograms by means of digital subtraction.
    Sato H; Ohki M; Kitamori H
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Jun; 25(6):448-55. PubMed ID: 9687118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative and subjective analysis of temporomandibular joint radiographs.
    Smith SR; Matteson SR; Phillips C; Tyndall DA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Oct; 62(4):456-63. PubMed ID: 2585313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of horizontal condylar angle and x-ray projection angle on the appearance of the condyle on lateral temporomandibular joint panoramic radiographs.
    Beloor Vasudeva S; Kameko N; Endo A; Okano T
    Oral Health Dent Manag; 2012 Dec; 11(4):177-84. PubMed ID: 23208594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Practical evaluation of the lateral temporomandibular joint radiograph.
    Weinberg LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 May; 51(5):676-85. PubMed ID: 6587091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Condylar and mandibular morphological criteria in the 2D and 3D MSCT imaging for patients with Class II division 1 subdivision malocclusion.
    Krisjane Z; Urtane I; Krumina G; Bieza A; Zepa K; Rogovska I
    Stomatologija; 2007; 9(3):67-71. PubMed ID: 17993738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validity of digital subtraction of transcranial plain films in quantification of positional changes of the mandibular condyle.
    Tyndall DA; Phillips C; Malone-Trahey A; Renner J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Jun; 71(6):748-55. PubMed ID: 2062527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic accuracy of film-based, TIFF, and wavelet compressed digital temporomandibular joint images.
    Trapnell CJ; Scarfe WC; Cook JH; Silvejra AM; Regennitter FJ; Haskell BS
    J Digit Imaging; 2000 Feb; 13(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 10696600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The validity of temporomandibular joint radiographs using the head positioner.
    Mikhail MG; Rosen H
    J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Oct; 42(4):441-6. PubMed ID: 290795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of mandibular condyle position: a comparison of transcranial radiographs and linear tomograms.
    Pullinger A; Hollender L
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1985 Sep; 60(3):329-34. PubMed ID: 3862048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the multiphasic dysfunction profile with lateral transcranial radiographs.
    Rieder CE; Martinoff JT
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Oct; 52(4):572-80. PubMed ID: 6594516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Condylar shape analysis using panoramic radiography units and conventional tomography.
    Mawani F; Lam EW; Heo G; McKee I; Raboud DW; Major PW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Mar; 99(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 15716843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temporomandibular joint space analysis.
    Cederberg RA
    Cranio; 1994 Jul; 12(3):172; discussion 177-8. PubMed ID: 7813029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.