These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15163156)

  • 21. Evaluation of resin based and glass ionomer based sealants placed with or without tooth preparation-a two year clinical trial.
    Dhar V; Chen H
    Pediatr Dent; 2012; 34(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 22353457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of glass-ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants: a 2-year clinical trial.
    Forss H; Saarni UM; Seppä L
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1994 Feb; 22(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 8143437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Marginal adaptation and retention of a glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomers and a polyacid-modified resin composite in cervical Class-V lesions.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Dent Mater; 1998 Jul; 14(4):294-306. PubMed ID: 10379259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Occlusal caries formation in vitro: comparison of resin-modified glass ionomer with fluoride-releasing sealant.
    Hicks MJ; Flaitz CM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 11314417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Glass ionomer as fissure sealant--a critical review.
    Simonsen RJ
    J Public Health Dent; 1996; 56(3 Spec No):146-9; discussion 161-3. PubMed ID: 8915960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of a sealant on the microleakage of composite resin restorations: an in vivo study.
    Akyüz S; Menteş A; Oktay C
    J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1992 Sep; 1(3):211-4. PubMed ID: 1308779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In vitro evaluation of marginal leakage using invasive and noninvasive technique of light cure glass ionomer and flowable polyacid modified composite resin used as pit and fissure sealant.
    Singla A; Garg S; Jindal SK; Suma Sogi HP; Sharma D
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 21891886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Handling and clinical performance of a glass ionomer sealant.
    Smales RJ; Lee YK; Lo FW; Tse CC; Chung MS
    Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):203-5. PubMed ID: 9545905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Heat-treated glass ionomer cement fissure sealants: retention after 1 year follow-up.
    Skrinjaric K; Vranic DN; Glavina D; Skrinjaric I
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2008 Sep; 18(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 18298543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Glass ionomer cements used as fissure sealants with the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach: review of literature.
    Yip HK; Smales RJ
    Int Dent J; 2002 Apr; 52(2):67-70. PubMed ID: 12013252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer/resin-based hybrid materials used as pit and fissure sealants.
    de Luca-Fraga LR; Pimenta LA
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Jun; 32(6):463-8. PubMed ID: 11491626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fissure seal or fluoride varnish?
    Deery C
    Evid Based Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):77-78. PubMed ID: 27767116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical/Photographic/Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis of Pit and Fissure Sealants After 22 Years: A Case Series.
    Sundfeld D; Machado LS; Franco LM; Salomão FM; Pini N; Sundefeld M; Pfeifer CS; Sundfeld RH
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(1):10-18. PubMed ID: 27723424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Microleakage, adaptation ability and clinical efficacy of two fluoride releasing fissure sealants.
    Marković D; Petrović B; Perić T; Blagojević D
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2012 Apr; 69(4):320-5. PubMed ID: 22624423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A clinical evaluation of air-abrasion treatment of questionable carious lesions. A 12-month report.
    Hamilton JC; Dennison JB; Stoffers KW; Welch KB
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Jun; 132(6):762-9. PubMed ID: 11433855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical performance of a glass ionomer sealant protected with two different resin-based agents over a 2-year follow-up period.
    Ulusoy AT; Tunc ES; Bayrak Ş
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2017 Mar; 18(1):10-14. PubMed ID: 28494595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An evaluation of sealant restorations after 2 years.
    Gray GB
    Br Dent J; 1999 Jun; 186(11):569-75. PubMed ID: 10405472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical evaluation of a surface pre-reacted glass (S-PRG) filler-containing dental sealant placed with a self-etching primer/adhesive.
    Ntaoutidou S; Arhakis A; Tolidis K; Kotsanos N
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2018 Dec; 19(6):431-437. PubMed ID: 30328064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Randomized, controlled trial comparing the retention of a flowable restorative system with a conventional resin sealant: one-year follow up.
    Corona SA; Borsatto MC; Garcia L; Ramos RP; Palma-Dibb RG
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2005 Jan; 15(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 15663444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Using a resin-modified glass ionomer as an occlusal sealant: a one-year clinical study.
    Winkler MM; Deschepper EJ; Dean JA; Moore BK; Cochran MA; Ewoldsen N
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Oct; 127(10):1508-14. PubMed ID: 8908921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.