636 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15163185)
1. Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions.
Ferrara P; Gohlke H; Price DJ; Klebe G; Brooks CL
J Med Chem; 2004 Jun; 47(12):3032-47. PubMed ID: 15163185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking.
Wang R; Lu Y; Wang S
J Med Chem; 2003 Jun; 46(12):2287-303. PubMed ID: 12773034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An extensive test of 14 scoring functions using the PDBbind refined set of 800 protein-ligand complexes.
Wang R; Lu Y; Fang X; Wang S
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(6):2114-25. PubMed ID: 15554682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A knowledge-based energy function for protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-DNA complexes.
Zhang C; Liu S; Zhu Q; Zhou Y
J Med Chem; 2005 Apr; 48(7):2325-35. PubMed ID: 15801826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance.
Perola E; Walters WP; Charifson PS
Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(2):235-49. PubMed ID: 15211508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. DrugScore(CSD)-knowledge-based scoring function derived from small molecule crystal data with superior recognition rate of near-native ligand poses and better affinity prediction.
Velec HF; Gohlke H; Klebe G
J Med Chem; 2005 Oct; 48(20):6296-303. PubMed ID: 16190756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.
Cheng T; Li X; Li Y; Liu Z; Wang R
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1079-93. PubMed ID: 19358517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. FURSMASA: a new approach to rapid scoring functions that uses a MD-averaged potential energy grid and a solvent-accessible surface area term with parameters GA fit to experimental data.
Pearlman DA; Rao BG; Charifson P
Proteins; 2008 May; 71(3):1519-38. PubMed ID: 18300249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved protein-ligand docking using GOLD.
Verdonk ML; Cole JC; Hartshorn MJ; Murray CW; Taylor RD
Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):609-23. PubMed ID: 12910460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Large-scale validation of a quantum mechanics based scoring function: predicting the binding affinity and the binding mode of a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes.
Raha K; Merz KM
J Med Chem; 2005 Jul; 48(14):4558-75. PubMed ID: 15999994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach.
Muegge I; Martin YC
J Med Chem; 1999 Mar; 42(5):791-804. PubMed ID: 10072678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Distinguishing native conformations of proteins from decoys with an effective free energy estimator based on the OPLS all-atom force field and the Surface Generalized Born solvent model.
Felts AK; Gallicchio E; Wallqvist A; Levy RM
Proteins; 2002 Aug; 48(2):404-22. PubMed ID: 12112706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The consequences of scoring docked ligand conformations using free energy correlations.
Spyrakis F; Amadasi A; Fornabaio M; Abraham DJ; Mozzarelli A; Kellogg GE; Cozzini P
Eur J Med Chem; 2007 Jul; 42(7):921-33. PubMed ID: 17346861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. General and targeted statistical potentials for protein-ligand interactions.
Mooij WT; Verdonk ML
Proteins; 2005 Nov; 61(2):272-87. PubMed ID: 16106379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigation of MM-PBSA rescoring of docking poses.
Thompson DC; Humblet C; Joseph-McCarthy D
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18465849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions.
Warren GL; Andrews CW; Capelli AM; Clarke B; LaLonde J; Lambert MH; Lindvall M; Nevins N; Semus SF; Senger S; Tedesco G; Wall ID; Woolven JM; Peishoff CE; Head MS
J Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 49(20):5912-31. PubMed ID: 17004707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of protein-ligand binding affinities using multiple instance learning.
Teramoto R; Kashima H
J Mol Graph Model; 2010 Nov; 29(3):492-7. PubMed ID: 20965757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions.
Gohlke H; Hendlich M; Klebe G
J Mol Biol; 2000 Jan; 295(2):337-56. PubMed ID: 10623530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of QM/MM scoring functions for molecular docking to HIV-1 protease.
Fong P; McNamara JP; Hillier IH; Bryce RA
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):913-24. PubMed ID: 19309119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Docking ligands into flexible and solvated macromolecules. 4. Are popular scoring functions accurate for this class of proteins?
Englebienne P; Moitessier N
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1568-80. PubMed ID: 19445499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
