These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15163194)

  • 1. SDOCKER: a method utilizing existing X-ray structures to improve docking accuracy.
    Wu G; Vieth M
    J Med Chem; 2004 Jun; 47(12):3142-8. PubMed ID: 15163194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. E-novo: an automated workflow for efficient structure-based lead optimization.
    Pearce BC; Langley DR; Kang J; Huang H; Kulkarni A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jul; 49(7):1797-809. PubMed ID: 19552372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conformation mining: an algorithm for finding biologically relevant conformations.
    Putta S; Landrum GA; Penzotti JE
    J Med Chem; 2005 May; 48(9):3313-8. PubMed ID: 15857136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lessons in molecular recognition: the effects of ligand and protein flexibility on molecular docking accuracy.
    Erickson JA; Jalaie M; Robertson DH; Lewis RA; Vieth M
    J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 14695819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance.
    Perola E; Walters WP; Charifson PS
    Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(2):235-49. PubMed ID: 15211508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations.
    Claussen H; Buning C; Rarey M; Lengauer T
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Apr; 308(2):377-95. PubMed ID: 11327774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):399-421. PubMed ID: 17096427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. FDS: flexible ligand and receptor docking with a continuum solvent model and soft-core energy function.
    Taylor RD; Jewsbury PJ; Essex JW
    J Comput Chem; 2003 Oct; 24(13):1637-56. PubMed ID: 12926007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Docking ligands onto binding site representations derived from proteins built by homology modelling.
    Schafferhans A; Klebe G
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Mar; 307(1):407-27. PubMed ID: 11243828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detailed analysis of grid-based molecular docking: A case study of CDOCKER-A CHARMm-based MD docking algorithm.
    Wu G; Robertson DH; Brooks CL; Vieth M
    J Comput Chem; 2003 Oct; 24(13):1549-62. PubMed ID: 12925999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fragment-based lead discovery using X-ray crystallography.
    Hartshorn MJ; Murray CW; Cleasby A; Frederickson M; Tickle IJ; Jhoti H
    J Med Chem; 2005 Jan; 48(2):403-13. PubMed ID: 15658854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maximum common binding modes (MCBM): consensus docking scoring using multiple ligand information and interaction fingerprints.
    Renner S; Derksen S; Radestock S; Mörchen F
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Feb; 48(2):319-32. PubMed ID: 18211051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of 3D-database molecular docking studies into homology models.
    Oshiro C; Bradley EK; Eksterowicz J; Evensen E; Lamb ML; Lanctot JK; Putta S; Stanton R; Grootenhuis PD
    J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(3):764-7. PubMed ID: 14736258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. GAsDock: a new approach for rapid flexible docking based on an improved multi-population genetic algorithm.
    Li H; Li C; Gui C; Luo X; Chen K; Shen J; Wang X; Jiang H
    Bioorg Med Chem Lett; 2004 Sep; 14(18):4671-6. PubMed ID: 15324886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A pharmacophore docking algorithm and its application to the cross-docking of 18 HIV-NNRTI's in their binding pockets.
    Daeyaert F; de Jonge M; Heeres J; Koymans L; Lewi P; Vinkers MH; Janssen PA
    Proteins; 2004 Feb; 54(3):526-33. PubMed ID: 14748000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Structural interaction fingerprint (SIFt): a novel method for analyzing three-dimensional protein-ligand binding interactions.
    Deng Z; Chuaqui C; Singh J
    J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(2):337-44. PubMed ID: 14711306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fragment-Based flexible ligand docking by evolutionary optimization.
    Budin N; Majeux N; Caflisch A
    Biol Chem; 2001 Sep; 382(9):1365-72. PubMed ID: 11688719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of input differences on the results of docking calculations.
    Feher M; Williams CI
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jul; 49(7):1704-14. PubMed ID: 19530660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automated docking of highly flexible ligands by genetic algorithms: a critical assessment.
    Cecchini M; Kolb P; Majeux N; Caflisch A
    J Comput Chem; 2004 Feb; 25(3):412-22. PubMed ID: 14696075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of docking performance: comparative data on docking algorithms.
    Kontoyianni M; McClellan LM; Sokol GS
    J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 14736237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.