BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15163817)

  • 1. Positional change in colon polyps at CT colonography.
    Laks S; Macari M; Bini EJ
    Radiology; 2004 Jun; 231(3):761-6. PubMed ID: 15163817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Reducing Abdominal Compression during Prone CT Colonography on Ascending Colonic Rotation during Supine-to-Prone Positional Change.
    Jang JK; Park SH; Lee JS; Kim HJ; Kim AY; Ha HK
    Korean J Radiol; 2016; 17(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 26798215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography.
    Yee J; Kumar NN; Hung RK; Akerkar GA; Kumar PR; Wall SD
    Radiology; 2003 Mar; 226(3):653-61. PubMed ID: 12601201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CT colonography: value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions.
    Chen SC; Lu DS; Hecht JR; Kadell BM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Mar; 172(3):595-9. PubMed ID: 10063842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative assessment of colonic movement between prone and supine patient positions during CT colonography.
    Punwani S; Halligan S; Tolan D; Taylor SA; Hawkes D
    Br J Radiol; 2009 Jun; 82(978):475-81. PubMed ID: 19124562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [CT-colonography with the 16-slice CT for the diagnostic evaluation of colorectal neoplasms and inflammatory colon diseases].
    Röttgen R; Schröder RJ; Lorenz M; Herbel A; Fischbach F; Herzog H; Lopez-Häninnen E; Gutberlet M; Hoffmann K; Helmig K; Felix R
    Rofo; 2003 Oct; 175(10):1384-91. PubMed ID: 14556108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results.
    Hoppe H; Quattropani C; Spreng A; Mattich J; Netzer P; Dinkel HP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 May; 182(5):1151-8. PubMed ID: 15100110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterization of lesions missed on interpretation of CT colonography using a 2D search method.
    Gluecker TM; Fletcher JG; Welch TJ; MacCarty RL; Harmsen WS; Harrington JR; Ilstrup D; Wilson LA; Corcoran KE; Johnson CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Apr; 182(4):881-9. PubMed ID: 15039159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Polyps: linear and volumetric measurement at CT colonography.
    Yeshwant SC; Summers RM; Yao J; Brickman DS; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ
    Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):802-11. PubMed ID: 17114627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of polyp distance on CT colonography between supine and prone scans using an automated path-distance measurement tool: correlation with colonoscopy.
    Park HS; Kim SH; Lee JM; Lee JY; Kim SG; Han JK; Choi BI
    Abdom Imaging; 2010 Feb; 35(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 19089490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: performance characteristics in an increased-risk population.
    Jensch S; de Vries AH; Peringa J; Bipat S; Dekker E; Baak LC; Bartelsman JF; Heutinck A; Montauban van Swijndregt AD; Stoker J
    Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):122-32. PubMed ID: 18292475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ascending colon rotation following patient positional change during CT colonography: a potential pitfall in interpretation.
    Kim JY; Park SH; Lee SS; Kim AY; Ha HK
    Eur Radiol; 2011 Feb; 21(2):353-9. PubMed ID: 20711732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients.
    Fletcher JG; Johnson CD; Welch TJ; MacCarty RL; Ahlquist DA; Reed JE; Harmsen WS; Wilson LA
    Radiology; 2000 Sep; 216(3):704-11. PubMed ID: 10966698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy.
    Iannaccone R; Laghi A; Catalano C; Brink JA; Mangiapane F; Trenna S; Piacentini F; Passariello R
    Radiology; 2003 Dec; 229(3):775-81. PubMed ID: 14657315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Colorectal polyps and cancers in asymptomatic average-risk patients: evaluation with CT colonography.
    Macari M; Bini EJ; Jacobs SL; Naik S; Lui YW; Milano A; Rajapaksa R; Megibow AJ; Babb J
    Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):629-36. PubMed ID: 14739311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computerized detection of colonic polyps at CT colonography on the basis of volumetric features: pilot study.
    Yoshida H; Masutani Y; MacEneaney P; Rubin DT; Dachman AH
    Radiology; 2002 Feb; 222(2):327-36. PubMed ID: 11818596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection.
    Macari M; Bini EJ; Xue X; Milano A; Katz SS; Resnick D; Chandarana H; Krinsky G; Klingenbeck K; Marshall CH; Megibow AJ
    Radiology; 2002 Aug; 224(2):383-92. PubMed ID: 12147833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CT colonography using 16-MDCT in the evaluation of colorectal cancer.
    Chung DJ; Huh KC; Choi WJ; Kim JK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jan; 184(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 15615957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Current role and future potential of computed tomographic colonography for colorectal polyp detection and colon cancer screening-incidental findings.
    Sohns C; Heuser M; Sossalla S; Wolff H; Obenauer S
    Clin Imaging; 2008; 32(4):280-6. PubMed ID: 18603183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Colorectal Polyps Missed with Optical Colonoscopy Despite Previous Detection and Localization with CT Colonography.
    Pooler BD; Kim DH; Weiss JM; Matkowskyj KA; Pickhardt PJ
    Radiology; 2016 Feb; 278(2):422-9. PubMed ID: 26280354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.