These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15164721)

  • 1. Editor in the eye of a storm.
    Lyall J
    BMJ; 2004 Feb; 328(7438):528. PubMed ID: 15164721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Charismatic doctor at vortex of vaccine dispute: experts argue over findings, but specialist sees possible MMR link to autism.
    Frankel G
    Washington Post; 2004 Jun; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 15328608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In no one's best interest.
    Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6978):1. PubMed ID: 14999243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A statement by the editors of The Lancet.
    Horton R
    Lancet; 2004 Mar; 363(9411):820-1. PubMed ID: 15022645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Media attack prompts editorial backlash against MMR study.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2004 Feb; 427(6977):765. PubMed ID: 14985719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Texas court dismisses defamation case brought by Andrew Wakefield against The BMJ.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 2014 Oct; 349():g5998. PubMed ID: 25288504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What conflict of interest?
    Chew M
    Med J Aust; 2004 Jul; 181(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 15233601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Editors should not be propagandists.
    Marcovitch H
    Arch Dis Child; 2009 Nov; 94(11):827-8. PubMed ID: 19846996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lancet retracts study linking autism to MMR vaccine.
    Michigan Department of Community Health
    Mich Med; 2010; 109(2):21. PubMed ID: 22930976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anatomy of a scare.
    Begley S
    Newsweek; 2009 Mar; 153(9):42-7. PubMed ID: 19413010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MMR--responding to retraction.
    Wakefield AJ; Harvey P; Linnell J
    Lancet; 2004 Apr; 363(9417):1327-8; discussion 1328. PubMed ID: 15094289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assuring research integrity in the wake of Wakefield.
    Opel DJ; Diekema DS; Marcuse EK
    BMJ; 2011 Jan; 342():d2. PubMed ID: 21245120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A perfect storm: lessons from the vaccine controversy.
    Jeffcoat MK
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2004 Apr; 135(4):402, 404. PubMed ID: 15127859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Which expert should I believe?
    North G
    Curr Biol; 2005 Jun; 15(12):R433. PubMed ID: 15964257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wakefield tells GMC he was motivated by concern for autistic children.
    Dyer O
    BMJ; 2008 Apr; 336(7647):738. PubMed ID: 18390510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Setting the record straight: vaccines, autism, and the Lancet.
    Ratzan SC
    J Health Commun; 2010 Apr; 15(3):237-9. PubMed ID: 20432106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MMR controversy raises questions about publication ethics.
    Fleck F
    Bull World Health Organ; 2004 Apr; 82(4):311-2. PubMed ID: 15296362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why did the Lancet take so long?
    Greenhalgh T
    BMJ; 2010 Feb; 340():c644. PubMed ID: 20124363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Secrets of the MMR scare. The Lancet's two days to bury bad news.
    Deer B
    BMJ; 2011 Jan; 342():c7001. PubMed ID: 21245118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lancet retracts Wakefield's MMR paper.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 2010 Feb; 340():c696. PubMed ID: 20124366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.