166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15164739)
1. Reproductive rights in Afghanistan: considerations of abortion regulation in light of the Afghan reconstruction process.
Brookes MM
Conn J Int Law; 2003; 18(2):595-619. PubMed ID: 15164739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reflections on the legalisation of abortion in Portugal.
Oliveira da Silva M
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2009 Aug; 14(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 19526419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion counselling and the 1995 German abortion law.
Funk N
Conn J Int Law; 1996; 12(1):33-65. PubMed ID: 16506337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
Van Detta JA
South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Is there life after Roe? How to think about the fetus.
Kissling F
Conscience; 2004-2005 Winter; 25(3):10-8. PubMed ID: 16538752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Contemporary Australian abortion law: the description of a crime and the negation of a woman's right to abortion.
Rankin MJ
Monash Univ Law Rev; 2001; 27(2):229-52. PubMed ID: 16493805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Advocacy for legal reform for safe abortion.
Ashenafi M
Afr J Reprod Health; 2004 Apr; 8(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 15487618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights.
Reilly EA
Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Symposium: A Celebration of Reproductive Rights: Twenty-Five Years of Roe v. Wade.
Perry T; Garcia MT; Baird B; Frietsche S
Womens Rights Law Report; 1998; 19(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 15871152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. After Ayotte: the need to defend abortion rights with renewed "purpose.".
Harv Law Rev; 2006 Jun; 119(8):2552-73. PubMed ID: 16827220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A woman decides: Justice O'Connor and due process rights of choice.
Davis PC; Gilligan C
McGeorge Law Rev; 2001; 32(3):895-914. PubMed ID: 16493803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States.
Weitz TA; Yanow S
Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Casey and its impact on abortion regulation.
Moses MF
Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):805-15. PubMed ID: 16700123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Abortion debate divides Mexico.
LaFranchi H
Christ Sci Monitor (East Ed); 2000 Aug; 92(184):6. PubMed ID: 15586922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Must we really make the case for abortion rights all over again?
Forde C
Conscience; 2005; 26(1):22-3. PubMed ID: 16639810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Access to abortion.
Read JE; Smith BJ
CMAJ; 2007 Feb; 176(4):492; author reply 494. PubMed ID: 17296966
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Under the radar.
Tumulty K; Novak V
Time; 2003 Jan; 161(4):38-41. PubMed ID: 12577595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart.
Borgmann CE
Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comments regarding the pregnant women's rights--and ethics].
Jeppesen U
Ugeskr Laeger; 2007 Mar; 169(10):933. PubMed ID: 17373041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Choice and the post-Roe generation.
Morse J
Time; 2003 Jan; 161(4):40-1. PubMed ID: 12577596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
