678 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15164740)
1. Going beyond parents and institutional review boards in protecting children involved in nontherapeutic research.
Rubinstein E
Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 2003; 33(2):251-94. PubMed ID: 15164740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Nontherapeutic research with children: the virtues and vices of legal uncertainty.
Smolin DM
Cumberland Law Rev; 2002-2003; 33(3):621-45. PubMed ID: 15378825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Institutional review boards, research on children, and informed consent of parents: walking the tightrope between encouraging vital experimentation and protecting subjects' rights.
Katerberg RJ
J Coll Univ Law; 1998; 24(3):545-79. PubMed ID: 16331880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Moral responsiveness in pediatric research ethics.
Moeller CJ
Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(4):W1-W3. PubMed ID: 14744302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Research with children.
Glantz LH
Am J Law Med; 1998; 24(2-3):213-44. PubMed ID: 9702273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Experimentation with children: the "pawns" of medical technology.
Porcaro ET
Medicoleg News; 1979; 7(2):6-9, 16. PubMed ID: 10243275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Finally, final rules on children who become research subjects.
Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Aug; 13(4):2-3. PubMed ID: 6629743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Family dynamics and children in medical research.
Gordon VM; Bonkovsky FO
J Clin Ethics; 1996; 7(4):349-54; discussion 362-4. PubMed ID: 9029336
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Additional protections for children involved as subjects in research--Department of Health and Human Services. Final rule.
Fed Regist; 1983 Mar; 48(46):9814-20. PubMed ID: 10259817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of institutional review boards in protecting human subjects: are we really ready to fix a broken system?
Beh HG
Law Psychol Rev; 2002; 26(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 16514756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Why we need legal standards for pediatric research.
Wendler D; Forster H
J Pediatr; 2004 Feb; 144(2):150-3. PubMed ID: 14760251
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Uninformed decisionmaking. The case of surrogate research consent.
Haimowitz S; Delano SJ; Oldham JM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(6):9-16. PubMed ID: 9474489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Research and experimentation in hospitals.
Bernstein AH
Hospitals; 1979 Oct; 53(19):58, 60, 64 passim. PubMed ID: 468176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The competence of children: no longer all or none.
Gaylin W
Hastings Cent Rep; 1982 Apr; 12(2):33-8. PubMed ID: 7096064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. When neonatal ICU infants participate in research: special protections for special subjects.
Thomas KA
Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am; 2009 Jun; 21(2):277-81. PubMed ID: 19460669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Law would remove ability of institutional review boards to waive written consent.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1996 Aug; 11(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Audience and authority: the story in front of the story.
Zoloth-Dorfman L
J Clin Ethics; 1996; 7(4):355-61. PubMed ID: 9029337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Institutional review boards (IRBs) failed to use steps to protect vulnerable research subjects.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2003 Jun; 18(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 15119342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Protection of human subjects; proposed establishment of regulations.
Fed Regist; 1979 Apr; 44(80):24106-11. PubMed ID: 10241036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Can children be enrolled in a placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of synthetic growth hormone?
Prentice ED; Antonson DL; Jameton A; Graber B; Sears T
IRB; 1989; 11(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 11659085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
