These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15164744)

  • 1. Contraceptive coverage laws: eliminating gender discrimination or infringing on religious liberties?
    Chettiar IM
    Univ Chic Law Rev; 2002; 69(4):1867-99. PubMed ID: 15164744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In good conscience: the legal trend to include prescription contraceptives in employer insurance plans and Catholic charities' "conscience clause" objection.
    Spota K
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 2003; 52(4):1081-113. PubMed ID: 15732206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sex discrimination or a hard pill for employers to swallow: examining the denial of contraceptive benefits in the wake of Erickson v. Bartell Drug Co.
    Korland L
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 2002; 53(2):531-67. PubMed ID: 16506335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An employer's exclusion of coverage for contraceptive drugs is not per se sex discrimination.
    Lidge EF
    Temple Law Rev; 2003; 76(3):533-77. PubMed ID: 16514770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Catholic Charities of Sacramento County v. Superior Court of Sacramento County.
    California. Supreme Court
    Wests Pac Report; 2004; 85():67-108. PubMed ID: 17225342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Catholic Charities v. Superior Court.
    California. Court of Appeal, Third District
    Wests Calif Report; 2001; 109():176-206. PubMed ID: 16479701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A battle over birth "control": legal and legislative employer prescription contraception benefit mandates.
    Loomis CK
    William Mary Bill Rights J; 2002 Dec; 11(1):463-94. PubMed ID: 16389684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From spiritual descriptions to legal prescriptions: religious imagery of women as "fetal container" in the law.
    Peach LJ
    J Law Relig; 1993-1994; 10(1):73-93. PubMed ID: 11656314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. AIDS caps, contraceptive coverage, and the law: an analysis of the federal anti-discrimination statutes' applicability to health insurance.
    Hoffman S
    Cardozo Law Rev; 2002 Mar; 23(4):1315-62. PubMed ID: 16506334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. RUNNING MOM AND POP BUSINESSES BY THE GOOD BOOK: THE SCOPE OF RELIGIOUS RIGHTS OF BUSINESS OWNERS.
    Selznick LF
    Albany Law Rev; 2015; 78(4):1353-92. PubMed ID: 27071216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Insurance: New York rejects religious challenge to law requiring employers to provide insurance coverage for contraceptives--Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Albany v. Serio.
    Gobeille B
    J Law Med Ethics; 2007; 35(3):503-6. PubMed ID: 17918669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Religious employers and exceptions to mandated coverage of contraceptives.
    Flicker LS
    Virtual Mentor; 2013 Mar; 15(3):220-5. PubMed ID: 23472812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Employment law--Title VII--Eighth Circuit holds that benefits plans excluding all contraceptives do not discriminate based on sex.--In re Union Pacific Railroad Employment Practices Litigation, 479 F.3d 936 (8th Cir. 2007), reh'g and reh'g en banc denied, No. 06-1706 (8th Cir. May 23, 2007).
    Harv Law Rev; 2008 Mar; 121(5):1447-54. PubMed ID: 18441613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Protecting "pregnant persons": women's equality and reproductive freedom.
    Ellis DA
    Const Law J; 1996; 6():967-77. PubMed ID: 11657887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the need for a federal conscience clause.
    Myers RS
    Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2001; 1(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 12862052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hobby Lobby, corporate law, and the theory of the firm: why for-profit corporations are RFRA persons.
    Meese AJ; Oman NB
    Harv Law Rev; 2014 May; 127(7):273-301. PubMed ID: 25330559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The contraception misconception: why prescription contraceptives should be covered by employer insurance plans.
    White JN
    Hofstra Law Rev; 2002; 31(1):271-302. PubMed ID: 15212034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Forced labor: a thirteenth amendment defense of abortion.
    Koppelman A
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1990; 84(2):480-535. PubMed ID: 11656392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lack of insurance coverage for prescription contraception by an otherwise comprehensive plan as a violation of Title VII as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act--stretching the statute too far.
    Backmeyer ER
    Indiana Law Rev; 2004; 37(2):437-66. PubMed ID: 16211763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Supreme Court decision in the Hobby Lobby Case: conscience, complicity, and contraception.
    Charo RA
    JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Oct; 174(10):1537-8. PubMed ID: 25024087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.