These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15167098)

  • 1. Comparison of an automatic versus a semiautomatic mode for gray-scale adaptation for digital chest radiography.
    Sailer J; Prokop M; Neitzel U; Weber M; Peloschek P; Schaefer-Prokop C
    Invest Radiol; 2004 Jun; 39(6):325-33. PubMed ID: 15167098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital chest imaging: selenium radiography versus storage phosphor imaging. Comparison of visualization of specific anatomic regions of the chest.
    Biemans JM; Van Heesewijk JP; Van Der Graaf Y
    Invest Radiol; 2002 Jan; 37(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 11753154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital chest radiography with a large-area flat-panel silicon X-ray detector: clinical comparison with conventional radiography.
    Hennigs SP; Garmer M; Jaeger HJ; Classen R; Jacobs A; Gissler HM; Christmann A; Mathias K
    Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(9):1688-96. PubMed ID: 11511890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dose reduction in digital chest radiography and perceived image quality.
    Kroft LJ; Veldkamp WJ; Mertens BJ; van Delft JP; Geleijns J
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Dec; 80(960):984-8. PubMed ID: 17940130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
    Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical comparative study with a large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector: image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on chest radiography.
    Fink C; Hallscheidt PJ; Noeldge G; Kampschulte A; Radeleff B; Hosch WP; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):481-6. PubMed ID: 11804922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Flat-panel-detector chest radiography: effect of tube voltage on image quality.
    Uffmann M; Neitzel U; Prokop M; Kabalan N; Weber M; Herold CJ; Schaefer-Prokop C
    Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):642-50. PubMed ID: 15858104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital chest radiography image quality assessment with dose reduction.
    Grewal RK; Young N; Colins L; Karunnaratne N; Sabharwal N
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2012 Mar; 35(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 22302464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Digital radiographic image presentation -- automatic or semiautomatic processing?].
    Rofo; 2005 Jan; 177(1):13. PubMed ID: 15657846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visibility of normal thoracic anatomic landmarks on storage phosphor digital radiography versus conventional radiography.
    Konen E; Greenberg I; Rozenman J
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2005 Aug; 7(8):495-7. PubMed ID: 16106773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality control phantom for digital chest radiography.
    Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Johnson GA; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 1997 Jan; 202(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 8988199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital chest radiography with a selenium-based flat-panel detector versus a storage phosphor system: comparison of soft-copy images.
    Goo JM; Im JG; Kim JH; Seo JB; Kim TS; Shine SJ; Lee W
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Oct; 175(4):1013-8. PubMed ID: 11000155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparative evaluation of six different body regions of the dog using analog and digital radiography].
    Meyer-Lindenberg A; Ebermaier C; Wolvekamp P; Tellhelm B; Meutstege FJ; Lang J; Hartung K; Fehr M; Nolte I
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2008; 121(5-6):216-27. PubMed ID: 18557526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chest radiography: depiction of normal anatomy and pathologic structures with selenium-based digital radiography versus conventional screen-film radiography.
    Woodard PK; Slone RM; Gierada DS; Reiker GG; Pilgram TK; Jost RG
    Radiology; 1997 Apr; 203(1):197-201. PubMed ID: 9122392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital chest imaging with a selenium detector: comparison with conventional radiography for visualization of specific anatomic regions of the chest.
    van Heesewijk HP; Neitzel U; van der Graaf Y; de Valois JC; Feldberg MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Sep; 165(3):535-40. PubMed ID: 7645464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Flat-panel display (LCD) versus high-resolution gray-scale display (CRT) for chest radiography: an observer preference study.
    Balassy C; Prokop M; Weber M; Sailer J; Herold CJ; Schaefer-Prokop C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Mar; 184(3):752-6. PubMed ID: 15728593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical aspects of quality criteria in digital radiography.
    Vetter S; Strecker EP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):33-6. PubMed ID: 11487839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Effect of digital radiography processing parameters on digital chest radiograph for occupational exposed workers].
    Wang XH; Liu DS; Xuan X; Kang H; Yuan HS
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2013 May; 31(5):351-5. PubMed ID: 23803524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High frequency edge enhancement in the detection of fine pulmonary lines. Parity between storage phosphor digital images and conventional chest radiography.
    Oestmann JW; Greene R; Rubens JR; Pile-Spellman E; Hall D; Robertson C; Llewellyn HJ; McCarthy KA; Potsaid M; White G
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Sep; 24(9):643-6. PubMed ID: 2807816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital chest radiography: effect on diagnostic accuracy of hard copy, conventional video, and reversed gray scale video display formats.
    MacMahon H; Metz CE; Doi K; Kim T; Giger ML; Chan HP
    Radiology; 1988 Sep; 168(3):669-73. PubMed ID: 3406396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.