BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15167659)

  • 1. Biomechanical comparison of kyphoplasty with different bone cements.
    Tomita S; Molloy S; Jasper LE; Abe M; Belkoff SM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jun; 29(11):1203-7. PubMed ID: 15167659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical evaluation of kyphoplasty with calcium sulfate cement in a cadaveric osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model.
    Perry A; Mahar A; Massie J; Arrieta N; Garfin S; Kim C
    Spine J; 2005; 5(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 16153574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of an inflatable bone tamp used in the treatment of compression fracture.
    Belkoff SM; Mathis JM; Fenton DC; Scribner RM; Reiley ME; Talmadge K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jan; 26(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 11154534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical evaluation of kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty with calcium phosphate cement in a simulated osteoporotic compression fracture.
    Tomita S; Kin A; Yazu M; Abe M
    J Orthop Sci; 2003; 8(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 12665956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of a hydroxyapatite cement for use with kyphoplasty.
    Belkoff SM; Mathis JM; Deramond H; Jasper LE
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2001; 22(6):1212-6. PubMed ID: 11415923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The biomechanics of vertebroplasty. The effect of cement volume on mechanical behavior.
    Belkoff SM; Mathis JM; Jasper LE; Deramond H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jul; 26(14):1537-41. PubMed ID: 11462082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An In Vitro Evaluation of Fracture Reduction Achieved by Inflatable Bone Tamps Under Simulated Physiological Load.
    Gordon M; Peppelman WC; Beutler W; OʼHalloran D; Chinthakunta SR; Bucklen B
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Feb; 30(1):E31-E37. PubMed ID: 28107240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical comparison of kyphoplasty versus a titanium mesh implant with cement for stabilization of vertebral compression fractures.
    Upasani VV; Robertson C; Lee D; Tomlinson T; Mahar AT
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):1783-8. PubMed ID: 20098352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of a hydroxyapatite cement for use with vertebroplasty.
    Belkoff SM; Mathis JM; Jasper LE; Deramond H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jul; 26(14):1542-6. PubMed ID: 11462083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An in vivo comparison of the potential for extravertebral cement leak after vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty.
    Phillips FM; Todd Wetzel F; Lieberman I; Campbell-Hupp M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Oct; 27(19):2173-8; discussion 2178-9. PubMed ID: 12394934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Initial outcome and efficacy of "kyphoplasty" in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
    Lieberman IH; Dudeney S; Reinhardt MK; Bell G
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jul; 26(14):1631-8. PubMed ID: 11464159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical evaluation of a new bone cement for use in vertebroplasty.
    Belkoff SM; Mathis JM; Erbe EM; Fenton DC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 May; 25(9):1061-4. PubMed ID: 10788848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical evaluation of an injectable calcium phosphate cement for vertebroplasty.
    Lim TH; Brebach GT; Renner SM; Kim WJ; Kim JG; Lee RE; Andersson GB; An HS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Jun; 27(12):1297-302. PubMed ID: 12065977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of an injectable, biodegradable calcium phosphate bone substitute for the prophylactic augmentation of osteoporotic vertebrae and the management of vertebral compression fractures.
    Bai B; Jazrawi LM; Kummer FJ; Spivak JM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Aug; 24(15):1521-6. PubMed ID: 10457570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical comparison of unipedicular versus bipedicular kyphoplasty.
    Steinmann J; Tingey CT; Cruz G; Dai Q
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jan; 30(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 15644756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical evaluation of an injectable radiopaque polypropylene fumarate cement for kyphoplasty in a cadaveric osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model.
    Kim C; Mahar A; Perry A; Massie J; Lu L; Currier B; Yaszemski MJ
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Dec; 20(8):604-9. PubMed ID: 18046174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical in vitro testing of human osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae following prophylactic kyphoplasty with different candidate materials.
    Rotter R; Pflugmacher R; Kandziora F; Ewert A; Duda G; Mittlmeier T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jun; 32(13):1400-5. PubMed ID: 17545907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical behavior of MRI-signal-inducing bone cements after vertebroplasty in osteoporotic vertebral bodies: An experimental cadaver study.
    Wichlas F; Trzenschik H; Tsitsilonis S; Rohlmann A; Bail HJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 May; 29(5):571-6. PubMed ID: 24703828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical efficacy of unipedicular versus bipedicular vertebroplasty for the management of osteoporotic compression fractures.
    Tohmeh AG; Mathis JM; Fenton DC; Levine AM; Belkoff SM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Sep; 24(17):1772-6. PubMed ID: 10488505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An ex vivo evaluation of an inflatable bone tamp used to reduce fractures within vertebral bodies under load.
    Belkoff SM; Jasper LE; Stevens SS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Aug; 27(15):1640-3. PubMed ID: 12163725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.