253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15168041)
1. Differential fermentation of glucose-based carbohydrates in vitro by human faecal bacteria--a study of pyrodextrinised starches from different sources.
Laurentin A; Edwards CA
Eur J Nutr; 2004 Jun; 43(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 15168041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro production of short-chain fatty acids from resistant starch by pig faecal inoculum.
Giuberti G; Gallo A; Moschini M; Masoero F
Animal; 2013 Sep; 7(9):1446-53. PubMed ID: 23782951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro fermentation of various fiber and starch sources by pig fecal inocula.
Wang JF; Zhu YH; Li DF; Wang Z; Jensen BB
J Anim Sci; 2004 Sep; 82(9):2615-22. PubMed ID: 15446478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Feeding potato flakes affects cecal short-chain fatty acids, microflora and fecal bile acids in rats.
Han KH; Hayashi N; Hashimoto N; Shimada K; Sekikawa M; Noda T; Fukushima M
Ann Nutr Metab; 2008; 52(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 18235187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Small intestinal malabsorption and colonic fermentation of resistant starch and resistant peptides to short-chain fatty acids.
Nordgaard I; Mortensen PB; Langkilde AM
Nutrition; 1995; 11(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 7544175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Starch fermentation by faecal bacteria of infants, toddlers and adults: importance for energy salvage.
Christian MT; Edwards CA; Preston T; Johnston L; Varley R; Weaver LT
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2003 Nov; 57(11):1486-91. PubMed ID: 14576763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of source and concentrations of dietary fiber on in vivo nitrogen excretion pathways in pigs as reflected by in vitro fermentation and nitrogen incorporation by fecal bacteria.
Bindelle J; Buldgen A; Delacollette M; Wavreille J; Agneessens R; Destain JP; Leterme P
J Anim Sci; 2009 Feb; 87(2):583-93. PubMed ID: 18791157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fermentation of resistant starches: influence of in vitro models on colon carcinogenesis.
Fässler C; Gill CI; Arrigoni E; Rowland I; Amadò R
Nutr Cancer; 2007; 58(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 17571971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anaerobic digestion of cattail by rumen cultures.
Hu ZH; Yu HQ
Waste Manag; 2006; 26(11):1222-8. PubMed ID: 16198552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of the amount of dietary fiber on the available energy from hindgut fermentation in growing pigs: use of cannulated pigs and in vitro fermentation.
Anguita M; Canibe N; Pérez JF; Jensen BB
J Anim Sci; 2006 Oct; 84(10):2766-78. PubMed ID: 16971578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Resistant starch derived from processed legumes: in vitro and in vivo fermentation characteristics.
Mahadevamma S; Shamala TR; Tharanathan RN
Int J Food Sci Nutr; 2004 Aug; 55(5):399-405. PubMed ID: 15545048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro fermentation of oat flours from typical and high beta-glucan oat lines.
Kim HJ; White PJ
J Agric Food Chem; 2009 Aug; 57(16):7529-36. PubMed ID: 19572543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A model to assess the use of caecal and faecal inocula to study fermentability of nutrients in rabbit.
Bovera F; D'Urso S; Meo CD; Tudisco R; Nizza A
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl); 2009 Apr; 93(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 19320927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro fermentability of differently digested resistant starch preparations.
Fässler C; Arrigoni E; Venema K; Brouns F; Amadò R
Mol Nutr Food Res; 2006 Dec; 50(12):1220-8. PubMed ID: 17103375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Two high-amylose maize starches with different amounts of resistant starch vary in their effects on fermentation, tissue and digesta mass accretion, and bacterial populations in the large bowel of pigs.
Bird AR; Vuaran M; Brown I; Topping DL
Br J Nutr; 2007 Jan; 97(1):134-44. PubMed ID: 17217569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dietary fibre and fermentability characteristics of root crops and legumes.
Mallillin AC; Trinidad TP; Raterta R; Dagbay K; Loyola AS
Br J Nutr; 2008 Sep; 100(3):485-8. PubMed ID: 18331664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Utilization of resistant starch of native tapioca, corn and waxy corn starches and their retrograded preparations by Bifidobacterium.
Wronkowska M; Soral-Smietana M; Biedrzycka E
Int J Food Sci Nutr; 2008 Feb; 59(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 18097846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro fermentation of different starches by mixed micro-organisms from the sheep rumen.
Ataşoğlu C; Yurtman IY
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl); 2007 Oct; 91(9-10):419-25. PubMed ID: 17845249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Potato and high-amylose maize starches are not equivalent producers of butyrate for the colonic mucosa.
Martin LJ; Dumon HJ; Lecannu G; Champ MM
Br J Nutr; 2000 Nov; 84(5):689-96. PubMed ID: 11177182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fermentation RS3 derived from sago and rice starch with Clostridium butyricum BCC B2571 or Eubacterium rectale DSM 17629.
Purwani EY; Purwadaria T; Suhartono MT
Anaerobe; 2012 Feb; 18(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 21979490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
