419 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15168568)
21. Top standards compliance issues for 2012.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2013 Apr; 33(4):1, 13-9. PubMed ID: 23641555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. How SII may affect your PPR.
Joint Commission
Jt Comm Perspect; 2008 Oct; 28(10):1, 3. PubMed ID: 19133597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Sample sizes set for organization assessment of compliance.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2003 Oct; 23(10):9-10. PubMed ID: 14582376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Scoring definitions revised for all accreditation manuals.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2001 Feb; 21(2):5. PubMed ID: 11246634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Joint Commission top standards compliance issues for 2010: challenging requirements identified.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2011 May; 31(5):1, 10-5. PubMed ID: 22312777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. What is a type I and how do you clear one?
Jt Comm Perspect; 2001 Feb; 21(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 11246635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. A new compliance reality when disaster strikes. Concentrate on providing safest, best care.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2005 Nov; 12(11):124-5. PubMed ID: 16276860
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Medicare Conditions of Participation outline additional standards for healthcare providers.
Brandt M
J AHIMA; 1995 Sep; 66(8):20-2, 24-6. PubMed ID: 10144972
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. What to know about JCAHO. Joint Commission survey process changing this year.
McLaughlin S
Health Facil Manage; 2006 Mar; 19(3):35-7. PubMed ID: 16594493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Update: additional scoring changes for all 2009 accreditation manuals.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2009 Jun; 29(6):8-9. PubMed ID: 19579473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. JCAHO offers two alternative ways to fulfill the periodic performance review.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2003 Oct; 23(10):1-5. PubMed ID: 14582373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Accreditation decision process supports continuous operational improvement.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 14746097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Communicating survey results.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Apr; 24(4):2, 8-9. PubMed ID: 15085693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Top 10 standards compliance issues in 2009. Challenging requirements identified.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2010 May; 30(5):5-10. PubMed ID: 20540406
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Top standards compliance issues for first half of 2011.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2011 Oct; 31(10):14-9. PubMed ID: 22312792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Standards, policy, and survey eligibility changes for 2001.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2000; 20(6):7. PubMed ID: 11142238
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of the full Periodic Performance Review (PPR), Option 1, Option 2, and Option 3.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Sep; 24(9):8-9. PubMed ID: 15484654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. New accreditation participation requirement regarding organizations' adherence to quality report approved for all programs.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 Mar; 25(3):4. PubMed ID: 16578958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Update on ORYX: the next evolution in accreditation.
Jt Comm Perspect; 1997; 17(5):15-30. PubMed ID: 10182300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Resolving type Is in a written progress report.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2001 Aug; 21(8):6-7. PubMed ID: 11519348
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
