These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15168670)
1. Eugenics and genetic testing. Holtzman NA Sci Context; 1998; 11(3-4):397-417. PubMed ID: 15168670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of the Human Genome Initiative on women's rights and reproductive decisions. Charo RA Fetal Diagn Ther; 1993 Apr; 8(Suppl. 1):148-59. PubMed ID: 11653014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Eugenics and the new genetics in Britain: examining contemporary professionals' accounts. Kerr A; Cunningham-Burley S; Amos A Sci Technol Human Values; 1998; 23(2):175-98. PubMed ID: 11656684 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Legal implications of amniocentesis. Friedman JM Univ PA Law Rev; 1974 Nov; 123(1):92-156. PubMed ID: 11664320 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Choices and rights: eugenics, genetics and disability equality. Shakespeare T Disabil Soc; 1998 Nov; 13(5):665-81. PubMed ID: 11660717 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Health and eugenics practices: looking towards the future. Romeo-Casabona CM Eur J Health Law; 1998 Sep; 5(3):241-60. PubMed ID: 11657581 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of recombinant DNA technology on genetic screening. Gauthier CC Public Aff Q; 1989 Jan; 3(1):25-48. PubMed ID: 11651935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Eugenics is alive and well: a survey of genetic professionals around the world. Wertz D Sci Context; 1998; 11(3-4):493-510. PubMed ID: 15168676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient autonomy and value-neutrality in nondirective genetic counseling. Wachbroit R; Wasserman D Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1995; 6(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 11660658 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Presidential Decree No. 33 of 27 October 1994 promulgating the Law of the People's Republic of China on the protection of maternal and child health. China Int Dig Health Legis; 1995; 46(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 11660854 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. How voluntary prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion increase the abnormal human gene pool. Boss JA Birth; 1990 Jun; 17(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 2363767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adventures in the germ line. Maddox J N Y Times Web; 1994 Dec; ():E15. PubMed ID: 11646323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Genetic counselling: ethical mediation of eugenic futures? Turnbull D Futures; 2000; 32(9-10):853-65. PubMed ID: 14626242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Freedom and responsibility in genetic testing. Brody BA Soc Philos Policy; 2002; 19(2):343-59. PubMed ID: 12678093 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproductive rights and the Human Genome Project. Walsh J South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 1994; 4(1):145-81. PubMed ID: 11660643 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Human Genome Initiative, women's rights and reproductive decisions. Charo RA Reprod Health Matters; 1994 Nov; No. 4():80-6. PubMed ID: 11660737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetics, eugenics, and public policy. Smith GP South Ill Univ Law J; 1985; 1985(3):435-53. PubMed ID: 11649816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Choosing eugenics: how far will nations go to eliminate a genetic disease? Guterman L Chron High Educ; 2003 May; 49(34):A22-4, A26. PubMed ID: 15287124 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Reprogenetics policy: three kinds of models. Nordgren A Community Genet; 1998; 1(2):61-70. PubMed ID: 11657630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]