286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15168911)
1. Interpreting change on ImPACT following sport concussion.
Iverson GL; Lovell MR; Collins MW
Clin Neuropsychol; 2003 Nov; 17(4):460-7. PubMed ID: 15168911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sex differences in neuropsychological function and post-concussion symptoms of concussed collegiate athletes.
Covassin T; Schatz P; Swanik CB
Neurosurgery; 2007 Aug; 61(2):345-50; discussion 350-1. PubMed ID: 17762747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validity of ImPACT for measuring processing speed following sports-related concussion.
Iverson GL; Lovell MR; Collins MW
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2005 Aug; 27(6):683-9. PubMed ID: 16019644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The relation between post concussion symptoms and neurocognitive performance in concussed athletes.
Fazio VC; Lovell MR; Pardini JE; Collins MW
NeuroRehabilitation; 2007; 22(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 17917171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. One-year test-retest reliability of the online version of ImPACT in high school athletes.
Elbin RJ; Schatz P; Covassin T
Am J Sports Med; 2011 Nov; 39(11):2319-24. PubMed ID: 21841066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The "value added" of neurocognitive testing after sports-related concussion.
Van Kampen DA; Lovell MR; Pardini JE; Collins MW; Fu FH
Am J Sports Med; 2006 Oct; 34(10):1630-5. PubMed ID: 16816151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computerized neuropsychological profiles of South African versus US athletes: a basis for commentary on cross-cultural norming issues in the sports concussion arena.
Shuttleworth-Edwards AB; Whitefield-Alexander VJ; Radloff SE; Taylor AM; Lovell MR
Phys Sportsmed; 2009 Dec; 37(4):45-52. PubMed ID: 20048540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the enduring residual neuropsychological effects of head trauma in college athletes who participate in contact sports.
Killam C; Cautin RL; Santucci AC
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2005 Jul; 20(5):599-611. PubMed ID: 15939185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Group versus individual administration affects baseline neurocognitive test performance.
Moser RS; Schatz P; Neidzwski K; Ott SD
Am J Sports Med; 2011 Nov; 39(11):2325-30. PubMed ID: 21828367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neurocognitive functioning and symptom reporting of high school athletes following a single concussion.
Tsushima WT; Shirakawa N; Geling O
Appl Neuropsychol Child; 2013; 2(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 23427772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitivity and specificity of the ImPACT Test Battery for concussion in athletes.
Schatz P; Pardini JE; Lovell MR; Collins MW; Podell K
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2006 Jan; 21(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 16143492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of a symptom-free waiting period on clinical outcome and risk of reinjury after sport-related concussion.
McCrea M; Guskiewicz K; Randolph C; Barr WB; Hammeke TA; Marshall SW; Kelly JP
Neurosurgery; 2009 Nov; 65(5):876-82; discussion 882-3. PubMed ID: 19834399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does a 20 minute cognitive task increase concussion symptoms in concussed athletes?
Covassin T; Crutcher B; Wallace J
Brain Inj; 2013; 27(13-14):1589-94. PubMed ID: 24143995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliable change, sensitivity, and specificity of a multidimensional concussion assessment battery: implications for caution in clinical practice.
Register-Mihalik JK; Guskiewicz KM; Mihalik JP; Schmidt JD; Kerr ZY; McCrea MA
J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2013; 28(4):274-83. PubMed ID: 22691965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of musculoskeletal injury on cognition: implications for concussion research.
Hutchison M; Comper P; Mainwaring L; Richards D
Am J Sports Med; 2011 Nov; 39(11):2331-7. PubMed ID: 21768531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retest reliability in adolescents of a computerized neuropsychological battery used to assess recovery from concussion.
Segalowitz SJ; Mahaney P; Santesso DL; MacGregor L; Dywan J; Willer B
NeuroRehabilitation; 2007; 22(3):243-51. PubMed ID: 17917174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differential rate of recovery in athletes after first and second concussion episodes.
Slobounov S; Slobounov E; Sebastianelli W; Cao C; Newell K
Neurosurgery; 2007 Aug; 61(2):338-44; discussion 344. PubMed ID: 17762746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neuropsychological testing of high school athletes. Preliminary norms and test-retest indices.
Barr WB
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2003 Jan; 18(1):91-101. PubMed ID: 14591481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical utility of ImPACT assessment for postconcussion return-to-play counseling: psychometric issues.
Mayers LB; Redick TS
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2012; 34(3):235-42. PubMed ID: 22149547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship between subjective test feedback provided by high-school athletes during computer-based assessment of baseline cognitive functioning and self-reported symptoms.
Schatz P; Neidzwski K; Moser RS; Karpf R
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2010 Jun; 25(4):285-92. PubMed ID: 20363733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
