106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1516937)
1. Maximal dynamic range electrotactile stimulation waveforms.
Kaczmarek KA; Webster JG; Radwin RG
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Jul; 39(7):701-15. PubMed ID: 1516937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A 16-channel 8-parameter waveform electrotactile stimulation system.
Kaczmarek KA; Kramer KM; Webster JG; Radwin RG
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1991 Oct; 38(10):933-43. PubMed ID: 1761295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pattern identification and perceived stimulus quality as a function of stimulation waveform on a fingertip-scanned electrotactile display.
Kaczmarek KA; Haase SJ
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Mar; 11(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 12797720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electric pulse frequency and magnitude of perceived sensation during electrocutaneous forearm stimulation.
Jelinek HF; McIntyre R
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Sep; 91(9):1378-82. PubMed ID: 20801255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimization of the power targeted to the frequency region of maximum tactile sensitivity.
Perez CA; Muñoz PA
Med Prog Technol; 1995 May; 21(2):67-76. PubMed ID: 7565397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. System development for multichannel electrotactile stimulation on the lips.
Shim JW; Liu W; Tang H
Med Eng Phys; 2006 Sep; 28(7):734-9. PubMed ID: 16386447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pattern identification as a function of stimulation current on a fingertip-scanned electrotactile display.
Kaczmarek KA; Haase SJ
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Sep; 11(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 14518790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation and comparison of 50 Hz current threshold of electrocutaneous sensations using different methods.
Lindenblatt G; Silny J
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2006 Dec; 7(12):933-46. PubMed ID: 17111461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lowering of sensory, motor, and pain-tolerance thresholds with burst duration using kilohertz-frequency alternating current electric stimulation.
Ward AR; Lucas-Toumbourou S
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Aug; 88(8):1036-41. PubMed ID: 17678667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intermittent stimulation delays adaptation to electrocutaneous sensory feedback.
Buma DG; Buitenweg JR; Veltink PH
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2007 Sep; 15(3):435-41. PubMed ID: 17894276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lowering of sensory, motor, and pain-tolerance thresholds with burst duration using kilohertz-frequency alternating current electric stimulation: part II.
Ward AR; Chuen WL
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Sep; 90(9):1619-27. PubMed ID: 19735792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Receptive field characteristics under electrotactile stimulation of the fingertip.
Warren JP; Bobich LR; Santello M; Sweeney JD; Tillery SI
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2008 Aug; 16(4):410-5. PubMed ID: 18713678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monophasic and biphasic stimulation evoke different responses.
Field-Fote EC; Anderson B; Robertson VJ; Spielholz NI
Muscle Nerve; 2003 Aug; 28(2):239-41. PubMed ID: 12872331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spatial localization of electrotactile stimuli on the fingertip in humans.
Bobich LR; Warren JP; Sweeney JD; Tillery SI; Santello M
Somatosens Mot Res; 2007 Dec; 24(4):179-88. PubMed ID: 18097991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differences in the magnitude of long-term potentiation produced by theta burst and high frequency stimulation protocols matched in stimulus number.
Hernandez RV; Navarro MM; Rodriguez WA; Martinez JL; LeBaron RG
Brain Res Brain Res Protoc; 2005 May; 15(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 15878145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of pulse rate on thresholds and loudness of biphasic and alternating monophasic pulse trains in electrical hearing.
van Wieringen A; Carlyon RP; Macherey O; Wouters J
Hear Res; 2006 Oct; 220(1-2):49-60. PubMed ID: 16904278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quadriceps femoris muscle torques and fatigue generated by neuromuscular electrical stimulation with three different waveforms.
Laufer Y; Ries JD; Leininger PM; Alon G
Phys Ther; 2001 Jul; 81(7):1307-16. PubMed ID: 11444994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Test of electric current perception thresholds at the fingertips--repeatability of the results].
Zamysłowska-Szmytke E
Med Pr; 1995; 46(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 9732847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationship between pulse rate and pulse width for a constant-intensity level of electrocutaneous stimulation.
Szeto AY
Ann Biomed Eng; 1985; 13(5):373-83. PubMed ID: 4073624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of burst frequency and duration of kilohertz-frequency alternating currents and of low-frequency pulsed currents on strength of contraction, muscle fatigue, and perceived discomfort.
Laufer Y; Elboim M
Phys Ther; 2008 Oct; 88(10):1167-76. PubMed ID: 18703676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
