These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15170797)
1. The role of ultrasound and fetal fibronectin in predicting the length of induced labor when the cervix is unfavorable. Roman H; Verspyck E; Vercoustre L; Degre S; Col JY; Firmin JM; Caron P; Marpeau L Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 23(6):567-73. PubMed ID: 15170797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does ultrasound examination when the cervix is unfavorable improve the prediction of failed labor induction? Roman H; Verspyck E; Vercoustre L; Degre S; Col JY; Firmin JM; Caron P; Marpeau L Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Apr; 23(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 15065185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery. Tan PC; Vallikkannu N; Suguna S; Quek KF; Hassan J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 17444553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of the cervix and digital examination before labor induction]. Gomes F; Ramalho C; Machado AP; Calado E; Cardoso F; Montenegro N Acta Med Port; 2006; 19(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 17187711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labor induction. Gabriel R; Darnaud T; Chalot F; Gonzalez N; Leymarie F; Quereux C Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 11896946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor. Rane SM; Guirgis RR; Higgins B; Nicolaides KH Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 24(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 15386612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of successful induction of labor at term: role of clinical history, digital examination, ultrasound assessment of the cervix, and fetal fibronectin assay. Reis FM; Gervasi MT; Florio P; Bracalente G; Fadalti M; Severi FM; Petraglia F Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Nov; 189(5):1361-7. PubMed ID: 14634569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor. Eggebø TM; Heien C; Økland I; Gjessing LK; Romundstad P; Salvesen KA Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 32(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 18528923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the Bishop score, ultrasonographically measured cervical length, and fetal fibronectin assay in predicting time until delivery and type of delivery at term. Rozenberg P; Goffinet F; Hessabi M Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jan; 182(1 Pt 1):108-13. PubMed ID: 10649164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the Bishop score, body mass index and transvaginal cervical length in predicting the success of labor induction. Uyar Y; Erbay G; Demir BC; Baytur Y Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Sep; 280(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 19130065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bishop score and ultrasound assessment of the cervix for prediction of time to onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy. Strobel E; Sladkevicius P; Rovas L; De Smet F; Karlsson ED; Valentin L Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 28(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 16817173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor. Pandis GK; Papageorghiou AT; Ramanathan VG; Thompson MO; Nicolaides KH Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):623-8. PubMed ID: 11844202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can ultrasound measurements replace digitally assessed elements of the Bishop score? Eggebø TM; Økland I; Heien C; Gjessing LK; Romundstad P; Salvesen KA Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(3):325-31. PubMed ID: 19172418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Value of Bishop score and ultrasound cervical length measurement in the prediction of cesarean delivery. Cubal A; Carvalho J; Ferreira MJ; Rodrigues G; Carmo OD J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1391-6. PubMed ID: 23815073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of the risk of cesarean delivery after labor induction in twin gestations based on clinical and ultrasound parameters. Han BR; Park KH; Lee SY; Jung EY; Park JW J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1125-31. PubMed ID: 27199212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bishop Score vs. ultrasound cervical length in the prediction of cervical ripening success and vaginal delivery in nulliparous women. Kehila M; Bougmiza I; Ben Hmid R; Abdelfatteh W; Mahjoub S; Channoufi MB Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Dec; 67(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 25964145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]