245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15171154)
1. The impact of Daubert: implications for testimony and research in forensic anthropology (and the use of frontal sinuses in personal identification).
Christensen AM
J Forensic Sci; 2004 May; 49(3):427-30. PubMed ID: 15171154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Expert testimony and positive identification of human remains through cranial suture patterns.
Rogers TL; Allard TT
J Forensic Sci; 2004 Mar; 49(2):203-7. PubMed ID: 15027532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Testing the reliability of frontal sinuses in positive identification.
Christensen AM
J Forensic Sci; 2005 Jan; 50(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 15830992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
Zlotnick J; Lin JR
Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The over-citation of Daubert in forensic anthropology.
Lesciotto KM; Christensen AM
J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jan; 69(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 37855082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Kumho, Daubert, and the nature of scientific inquiry: implications for forensic anthropology.
Grivas CR; Komar DA
J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):771-6. PubMed ID: 18489550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Capillary electrophoresis in court: the landmark decision of the People of Tennessee versus Ware.
Marchi E; Pasacreta RJ
J Capillary Electrophor; 1997; 4(4):145-56. PubMed ID: 9627830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Forensic identification science evidence since Daubert: Part I--A quantitative analysis of the exclusion of forensic identification science evidence.
Page M; Taylor J; Blenkin M
J Forensic Sci; 2011 Sep; 56(5):1180-4. PubMed ID: 21884119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of Daubert on the admissibility of forensic anthropology expert testimony.
Lesciotto KM
J Forensic Sci; 2015 May; 60(3):549-55. PubMed ID: 25716577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Should human figure drawings be admitted into court?
Lally SJ
J Pers Assess; 2001 Feb; 76(1):135-49. PubMed ID: 11206294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new digital method for the objective comparison of frontal sinuses for identification.
Cox M; Malcolm M; Fairgrieve SI
J Forensic Sci; 2009 Jul; 54(4):761-72. PubMed ID: 19486246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative EEG and the Frye and Daubert standards of admissibility.
Thatcher RW; Biver CJ; North DM
Clin Electroencephalogr; 2003 Apr; 34(2):39-53. PubMed ID: 12784902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Forensic identification science evidence since Daubert: Part II--judicial reasoning in decisions to exclude forensic identification evidence on grounds of reliability.
Page M; Taylor J; Blenkin M
J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jul; 56(4):913-7. PubMed ID: 21729081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating science outside the trial box: applying Daubert to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines' criminal history score.
Krauss DA
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2006; 29(4):289-305. PubMed ID: 16530267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On the assessment of children in suspected child sexual abuse in light of Daubert and Frye: limitations of profiles and interviews as scientifically grounded evidence.
Bigelow BJ
J Forensic Sci; 2000 May; 45(3):573-81. PubMed ID: 10855961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Standardizing the psychological autopsy: addressing the Daubert standard.
Snider JE; Hane S; Berman AL
Suicide Life Threat Behav; 2006 Oct; 36(5):511-8. PubMed ID: 17087630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Meeting a Forensic Podiatry Admissibility Challenge: A Daubert Case Study.
Nirenberg M
J Forensic Sci; 2016 May; 61(3):833-841. PubMed ID: 27122428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiographic human identification using bones of the hand: a validation study.
Koot MG; Sauer NJ; Fenton TW
J Forensic Sci; 2005 Mar; 50(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 15813535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Admissibility of scientific evidence in courts.
Davies J
Med Law; 2005 Jun; 24(2):243-57. PubMed ID: 16082863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Skeletal identification using the frontal sinus region: a retrospective study of 39 cases.
Kirk NJ; Wood RE; Goldstein M
J Forensic Sci; 2002 Mar; 47(2):318-23. PubMed ID: 11908601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
