These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15171154)

  • 21. Post-Daubert admissibility of scientific evidence on malingering of cognitive deficits.
    Vallabhajosula B; van Gorp WG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(2):207-15. PubMed ID: 11471788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fixed vs. flexible neuropsychological test batteries under the Daubert standard for the admissibility of scientific evidence.
    Reed JE
    Behav Sci Law; 1996; 14(3):315-22. PubMed ID: 8963383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Osteopathic physicians and expert medical testimony.
    McAbee GN
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1997 Jan; 97(1):47-8. PubMed ID: 9029880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evidentiary standards for forensic anthropology.
    Christensen AM; Crowder CM
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Nov; 54(6):1211-6. PubMed ID: 19804520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals: active judicial scrutiny of scientific evidence.
    Kirsch EW
    Food Drug Law J; 1995; 50(2):213-34. PubMed ID: 10342992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ten years after Daubert: the status of the states.
    Keierleber JA; Bohan TL
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Sep; 50(5):1154-63. PubMed ID: 16225224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The reliability of visually comparing small frontal sinuses.
    Smith VA; Christensen AM; Myers SW
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Nov; 55(6):1413-5. PubMed ID: 20629903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Admissibility and per se exclusion of hypnotically elicited recall in American courts of law.
    Perry C
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1997 Jul; 45(3):266-79. PubMed ID: 9204639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. New perspectives in forensic anthropology.
    Dirkmaat DC; Cabo LL; Ousley SD; Symes SA
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2008; Suppl 47():33-52. PubMed ID: 19003882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Personal identification using the frontal sinus.
    Besana JL; Rogers TL
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 May; 55(3):584-9. PubMed ID: 20102475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Ten years of judicial gatekeeping under Daubert.
    Cecil JS
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S74-80. PubMed ID: 16030342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessing the variation in individual frontal sinus outlines.
    Christensen AM
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2005 Jul; 127(3):291-5. PubMed ID: 15584070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessing forensic applications of the frontal sinus in a Chinese Han population.
    Tang JP; Hu DY; Jiang FH; Yu XJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Jan; 183(1-3):104.e1-3. PubMed ID: 19081689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Admissibility of scientific evidence post-Daubert.
    Masten J; Strzelczyk JJ
    Health Phys; 2001 Dec; 81(6):678-82. PubMed ID: 11725886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Psychological evidence at the dawn of the law's scientific age.
    Faigman DL; Monahan J
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2005; 56():631-59. PubMed ID: 15709949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Skeletal estimation and identification in American and East European populations.
    Kimmerle EH; Jantz RL; Konigsberg LW; Baraybar JP
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 May; 53(3):524-32. PubMed ID: 18471195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The presentation of forensic psychiatric evidence in court.
    Gutheil TG
    Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2000; 37(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 10994298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Congressional action to amend Federal Rule of Evidence 702: a mischievous attempt to codify Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
    Farrell NS
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1997; 13(2):523-51. PubMed ID: 9212529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical practice guidelines as learned treatises: understanding their use as evidence in the courtroom.
    Recupero PR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(3):290-301. PubMed ID: 18802175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Frontal sinuses for identification: quality of classifications, possible error and potential corrections.
    Cameriere R; Ferrante L; Mirtella D; Rollo FU; Cingolani M
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Jul; 50(4):770-3. PubMed ID: 16078475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.