These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15171807)

  • 1. A note on preliminary tests of equality of variances.
    Zimmerman DW
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2004 May; 57(Pt 1):173-81. PubMed ID: 15171807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of five two-sample location tests for skewed distributions with unequal variances.
    Fagerland MW; Sandvik L
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Sep; 30(5):490-6. PubMed ID: 19577012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unequal group variances in microarray data analyses.
    Demissie M; Mascialino B; Calza S; Pawitan Y
    Bioinformatics; 2008 May; 24(9):1168-74. PubMed ID: 18344518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On sample size calculation for 2x2 fixed-effect ANOVA when variances are unknown and possibly unequal.
    Guo JH; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):417-25. PubMed ID: 18559139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Approximate sample size formulas for the two-sample trimmed mean test with unequal variances.
    Luh WM; Guo JH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):137-46. PubMed ID: 17535584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Power of a test that is robust against variance heterogeneity.
    Overall JE; Atlas RS; Gibson JM
    Psychol Rep; 1995 Aug; 77(1):155-9. PubMed ID: 7501755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The variable-criteria sequential stopping rule: generality to unequal sample sizes, unequal variances, or to large ANOVAs.
    Fitts DA
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 Nov; 42(4):918-29. PubMed ID: 21139159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A simple and effective decision rule for choosing a significance test to protect against non-normality.
    Zimmerman DW
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):388-409. PubMed ID: 21973093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Welch-type test for homogeneity of contrasts under heteroscedasticity with application to meta-analysis.
    Kulinskaya E; Dollinger MB; Knight E; Gao H
    Stat Med; 2004 Dec; 23(23):3655-70. PubMed ID: 15534893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of covariance with pre-treatment measurements in randomized trials: comparison of equal and unequal slopes.
    Funatogawa I; Funatogawa T
    Biom J; 2011 Sep; 53(5):810-21. PubMed ID: 21887795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Further evaluating the conditional decision rule for comparing two independent means.
    Hayes AF; Cai L
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 Nov; 60(Pt 2):217-44. PubMed ID: 17971268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Guidelines for statistical analysis of percentage of syllables stuttered data.
    Jones M; Onslow M; Packman A; Gebski V
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 49(4):867-78. PubMed ID: 16908881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recommendations for applying tests of equivalence.
    Cribbie RA; Gruman JA; Arpin-Cribbie CA
    J Clin Psychol; 2004 Jan; 60(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 14692005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A simple procedure to compute the sample size needed to compare two independent groups when the population variances are unequal.
    Singer J
    Stat Med; 2001 Apr; 20(7):1089-95. PubMed ID: 11276038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New heterogeneous test statistics for the unbalanced fixed-effect nested design.
    Guo JH; Billard L; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):259-76. PubMed ID: 21492132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Power and Type I errors for pairwise comparisons of means in the unequal variances case.
    Ramsey PH; Ramsey PP
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):263-81. PubMed ID: 18331666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the likelihood ratio test statistic for the number of components in a normal mixture of unequal variances.
    Feng ZD; McCulloch CE
    Biometrics; 1994 Dec; 50(4):1158-62. PubMed ID: 7786997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consequences of choosing samples in hypothesis testing to ensure homogeneity of variance.
    Zimmerman DW
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Feb; 67(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 23330909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robust step-down tests for multivariate independent group designs.
    Lix LM; Fouladi RT
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 Nov; 60(Pt 2):245-65. PubMed ID: 17971269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Review of the two sample t tests.
    Foster SD; Gerald KB
    Nurse Anesth; 1990 Mar; 1(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 2285714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.