These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15172556)

  • 1. Phonological underspecification and mapping mechanisms in the speech recognition lexicon.
    Wheeldon L; Waksler R
    Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):401-12. PubMed ID: 15172556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Underspecification in toddlers' and adults' lexical representations.
    Ren J; Cohen Priva U; Morgan JL
    Cognition; 2019 Dec; 193():103991. PubMed ID: 31525643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The mental lexicon is fully specified: evidence from eye-tracking.
    Mitterer H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Apr; 37(2):496-513. PubMed ID: 21463085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is phonological context always used to recognize variant forms in spoken word recognition? The role of variant frequency and context distribution.
    Ranbom LJ; Connine CM; Yudman EM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Aug; 35(4):1205-20. PubMed ID: 19653759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phonological variant recognition: representations and rules.
    Pinnow E; Connine CM
    Lang Speech; 2014 Mar; 57(Pt 1):42-67. PubMed ID: 24754220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The elusive nature of early phonological priming effects: are there individual differences?
    Holyk GG; Pexman PM
    Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):353-67. PubMed ID: 15172552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Processing reduced word forms: the suffix restoration effect.
    Kemps R; Ernestus M; Schreuder R; Baayen H
    Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):117-27. PubMed ID: 15172530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Developmental dyslexia: ERP correlates of anomalous phonological processing during spoken word recognition.
    Bonte ML; Blomert L
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Nov; 21(3):360-76. PubMed ID: 15511652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neurophysiological evidence for underspecified lexical representations: asymmetries with word initial variations.
    Friedrich CK; Lahiri A; Eulitz C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1545-59. PubMed ID: 19045992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repetition priming and experimental context effects.
    Hamburger M; Slowiaczek LM
    Am J Psychol; 1998; 111(1):1-31. PubMed ID: 9624701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recognizing speech under a processing load: dissociating energetic from informational factors.
    Mattys SL; Brooks J; Cooke M
    Cogn Psychol; 2009 Nov; 59(3):203-43. PubMed ID: 19423089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Regularity re-revisited: modality matters.
    Tsapkini K; Jarema G; Kehayia E
    Brain Lang; 2004 Jun; 89(3):611-6. PubMed ID: 15120552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "What you encode is not necessarily what you store": evidence for sparse feature representations from mismatch negativity.
    Cornell SA; Lahiri A; Eulitz C
    Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 1394():79-89. PubMed ID: 21549357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psycholinguistic evidence for the underspecification of morphosyntactic features.
    Penke M; Janssen U; Eisenbeiss S
    Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):423-33. PubMed ID: 15172558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are the same phoneme and lexical layers used in speech production and comprehension? A case-series test of model of aphasic speech production.
    Hanley JR; Nickels L
    Cortex; 2009 Jun; 45(6):784-90. PubMed ID: 19103444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Graded semantic and phonological similarity effects in priming: evidence for a distributed connectionist approach to morphology.
    Gonnerman LM; Seidenberg MS; Andersen ES
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 May; 136(2):323-45. PubMed ID: 17500654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reading aloud is not automatic: processing capacity is required to generate a phonological code from print.
    Reynolds M; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1303-23. PubMed ID: 17154774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developmental surface dyslexias.
    Friedmann N; Lukov L
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1146-60. PubMed ID: 18761129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phonological priming in auditory word recognition: when both controlled and automatic processes are responsible for the effects.
    Dufour S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Mar; 62(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 18473627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are phonological representations of printed and spoken language isomorphic? Evidence from the restrictions on unattested onsets.
    Berent I
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Oct; 34(5):1288-304. PubMed ID: 18823212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.