BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15173236)

  • 1. A new scoring system for the chances of identifying a BRCA1/2 mutation outperforms existing models including BRCAPRO.
    Evans DG; Eccles DM; Rahman N; Young K; Bulman M; Amir E; Shenton A; Howell A; Lalloo F
    J Med Genet; 2004 Jun; 41(6):474-80. PubMed ID: 15173236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carrier prediction models in breast and/or ovarian cancer families of French Canadian descent.
    Oros KK; Ghadirian P; Maugard CM; Perret C; Paredes Y; Mes-Masson AM; Foulkes WD; Provencher D; Tonin PN
    Clin Genet; 2006 Oct; 70(4):320-9. PubMed ID: 16965326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation prevalence, risk prediction models and a multistep testing approach in French-Canadian families with high risk of breast and ovarian cancer.
    Simard J; Dumont M; Moisan AM; Gaborieau V; Malouin H; Durocher F; Chiquette J; Plante M; Avard D; Bessette P; Brousseau C; Dorval M; Godard B; Houde L; ; Joly Y; Lajoie MA; Leblanc G; Lépine J; Lespérance B; Vézina H; Parboosingh J; Pichette R; Provencher L; Rhéaume J; Sinnett D; Samson C; Simard JC; Tranchant M; Voyer P; Easton D; Tavtigian SV; Knoppers BM; Laframboise R; Bridge P; Goldgar D
    J Med Genet; 2007 Feb; 44(2):107-21. PubMed ID: 16905680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison between CaGene 5.1 and 6.0 for BRCA1/2 mutation prediction: a retrospective study of 150 BRCA1/2 genetic tests in 517 families with breast/ovarian cancer.
    Antonucci I; Provenzano M; Sorino L; Balsamo M; Aceto GM; Battista P; Euhus D; Cianchetti E; Ballerini P; Natoli C; Palka G; Stuppia L
    J Hum Genet; 2017 Mar; 62(3):379-387. PubMed ID: 27928164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting the likelihood of carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation: validation of BOADICEA, BRCAPRO, IBIS, Myriad and the Manchester scoring system using data from UK genetics clinics.
    Antoniou AC; Hardy R; Walker L; Evans DG; Shenton A; Eeles R; Shanley S; Pichert G; Izatt L; Rose S; Douglas F; Eccles D; Morrison PJ; Scott J; Zimmern RL; Easton DF; Pharoah PD
    J Med Genet; 2008 Jul; 45(7):425-31. PubMed ID: 18413374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of BRCA1/2 mutation prediction models in male breast cancer patients.
    Moghadasi S; Grundeken V; Janssen LAM; Dijkstra NH; Rodríguez-Girondo M; van Zelst-Stams WAG; Oosterwijk JC; Ausems MGEM; Oldenburg RA; Adank MA; Blom EW; Ruijs MWG; van Os TAM; van Deurzen CHM; Martens JWM; Schroder CP; Wijnen JT; Vreeswijk MPG; van Asperen CJ
    Clin Genet; 2018 Jan; 93(1):52-59. PubMed ID: 28589637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of the Manchester scoring system for predicting BRCA1/2 mutations in 9,390 families suspected of having hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.
    Kast K; Schmutzler RK; Rhiem K; Kiechle M; Fischer C; Niederacher D; Arnold N; Grimm T; Speiser D; Schlegelberger B; Varga D; Horvath J; Beer M; Briest S; Meindl A; Engel C
    Int J Cancer; 2014 Nov; 135(10):2352-61. PubMed ID: 24700448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the relative effectiveness of the 2017 updated Manchester scoring system for predicting
    Chew W; Moorakonda RB; Courtney E; Soh H; Li ST; Chen Y; Shaw T; Allen JC; Evans DGR; Ngeow J
    J Med Genet; 2018 May; 55(5):344-350. PubMed ID: 29275357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of two different models to predict BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a cohort of Danish hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer families.
    Gerdes AM; Cruger DG; Thomassen M; Kruse TA
    Clin Genet; 2006 Feb; 69(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 16433698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Probability of BRCA1/2 mutation varies with ovarian histology: results from screening 442 ovarian cancer families.
    Evans DG; Young K; Bulman M; Shenton A; Wallace A; Lalloo F
    Clin Genet; 2008 Apr; 73(4):338-45. PubMed ID: 18312450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of the pedigree assessment tool (PAT) in families with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.
    Teller P; Hoskins KF; Zwaagstra A; Stanislaw C; Iyengar R; Green VL; Gabram SG
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Jan; 17(1):240-6. PubMed ID: 19763692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. BRCAPRO validation, sensitivity of genetic testing of BRCA1/BRCA2, and prevalence of other breast cancer susceptibility genes.
    Berry DA; Iversen ES; Gudbjartsson DF; Hiller EH; Garber JE; Peshkin BN; Lerman C; Watson P; Lynch HT; Hilsenbeck SG; Rubinstein WS; Hughes KS; Parmigiani G
    J Clin Oncol; 2002 Jun; 20(11):2701-12. PubMed ID: 12039933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Probability estimation models for prediction of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: COS compares favourably with other models.
    Roudgari H; Miedzybrodzka ZH; Haites NE
    Fam Cancer; 2008; 7(3):199-212. PubMed ID: 18097771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Family history predictors of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation status among Tunisian breast/ovarian cancer families.
    Riahi A; Ghourabi ME; Fourati A; Chaabouni-Bouhamed H
    Breast Cancer; 2017 Mar; 24(2):238-244. PubMed ID: 27025497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations to inherited ovarian cancer.
    Ramus SJ; Harrington PA; Pye C; DiCioccio RA; Cox MJ; Garlinghouse-Jones K; Oakley-Girvan I; Jacobs IJ; Hardy RM; Whittemore AS; Ponder BA; Piver MS; Pharoah PD; Gayther SA
    Hum Mutat; 2007 Dec; 28(12):1207-15. PubMed ID: 17688236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pretest prediction of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation by risk counselors and the computer model BRCAPRO.
    Euhus DM; Smith KC; Robinson L; Stucky A; Olopade OI; Cummings S; Garber JE; Chittenden A; Mills GB; Rieger P; Esserman L; Crawford B; Hughes KS; Roche CA; Ganz PA; Seldon J; Fabian CJ; Klemp J; Tomlinson G
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Jun; 94(11):844-51. PubMed ID: 12048272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal selection for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing using a combination of 'easy to apply' probability models.
    Bodmer D; Ligtenberg MJ; van der Hout AH; Gloudemans S; Ansink K; Oosterwijk JC; Hoogerbrugge N
    Br J Cancer; 2006 Sep; 95(6):757-62. PubMed ID: 16909138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statewide Retrospective Review of Familial Pancreatic Cancer in Delaware, and Frequency of Genetic Mutations in Pancreatic Cancer Kindreds.
    Catts ZA; Baig MK; Milewski B; Keywan C; Guarino M; Petrelli N
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 May; 23(5):1729-35. PubMed ID: 26727920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving the accuracy of BRCA1/2 mutation prediction: validation of the novel country-customized IC software.
    Capalbo C; Ricevuto E; Vestri A; Sidoni T; Buffone A; Cortesi E; Marchetti P; Scambia G; Tomao S; Rinaldi C; Zani M; Ferraro S; Frati L; Screpanti I; Gulino A; Giannini G
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2006 Jan; 14(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 16288312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pre-test prediction models of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation in breast/ovarian families attending familial cancer clinics.
    de la Hoya M; Díez O; Pérez-Segura P; Godino J; Fernández JM; Sanz J; Alonso C; Baiget M; Díaz-Rubio E; Caldés T
    J Med Genet; 2003 Jul; 40(7):503-10. PubMed ID: 12843322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.