200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15173672)
1. Is pipelle biopsy really adequate for diagnosing endometrial disease?
Tanriverdi HA; Barut A; Gün BD; Kaya E
Med Sci Monit; 2004 Jun; 10(6):CR271-4. PubMed ID: 15173672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Which is the best technique for endometrial sampling? Aspiration (pipelle) versus dilatation and curettage (D&C).
Demirkiran F; Yavuz E; Erenel H; Bese T; Arvas M; Sanioglu C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Nov; 286(5):1277-82. PubMed ID: 22766754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the success of histopathological diagnosis with dilatation-curettage and Pipelle endometrial sampling.
Kazandi M; Okmen F; Ergenoglu AM; Yeniel AO; Zeybek B; Zekioglu O; Ozdemir N
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Nov; 32(8):790-4. PubMed ID: 23075358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasound examination of the endometrium before and after Pipelle endometrial sampling.
Van den Bosch T; Van Schoubroeck D; Ameye L; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 26(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 16082721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combination of vaginal ultrasonography and pipelle sampling in the diagnosis of endometrial disease.
Kavak Z; Ceyhan N; Pekin S
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Feb; 36(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 8775255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The accuracy of endometrial Pipelle sampling with and without sonographic measurement of endometrial thickness.
Goldchmit R; Katz Z; Blickstein I; Caspi B; Dgani R
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Nov; 82(5):727-30. PubMed ID: 8414316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pipelle endometrial sampling in patients with known endometrial carcinoma.
Stovall TG; Photopulos GJ; Poston WM; Ling FW; Sandles LG
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Jun; 77(6):954-6. PubMed ID: 2030877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison the Diagnostic Value of Dilatation and Curettage Versus Endometrial Biopsy by Pipelle--a Clinical Trial.
Sanam M; Majid MM
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(12):4971-5. PubMed ID: 26163624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Pipelle sampler with conventional dilatation and curettage (D&C) for Chinese endometrial biopsy.
Liu H; Wang FL; Zhao YM; Yao YQ; Li YL
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015; 35(5):508-11. PubMed ID: 25549755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outpatient endometrial biopsy with Pipelle vs diagnostic dilatation and curettage.
Rauf R; Shaheen A; Sadia S; Waqar F; Zafar S; Sultana S; Waseem S
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2014; 26(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 25603664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the histopathological diagnoses of preoperative dilatation and curettage and Pipelle biopsy.
Gungorduk K; Asicioglu O; Ertas IE; Ozdemir IA; Ulker MM; Yildirim G; Ataser G; Sanci M
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2014; 35(5):539-43. PubMed ID: 25423700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pipelle biopsy and dilatation and curettage in clinical practice: are factors affecting their effectiveness the same?
Piatek S; Warzecha D; Kisielewski F; Szymusik I; Panek G; Wielgos M
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Mar; 45(3):645-651. PubMed ID: 30548369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endometrial directed biopsy during sonohysterography using the NiGo device: prospective study in women with abnormal uterine bleeding.
Gorlero F; Nicoletti L; Lijoi D; Ferrero S; Pullè A; Ragni N
Fertil Steril; 2008 Apr; 89(4):984-90. PubMed ID: 17612538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outpatient endometrial sampling with the Pipelle curette.
Ben-Baruch G; Seidman DS; Schiff E; Moran O; Menczer J
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1994; 37(4):260-2. PubMed ID: 8050731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Different methods for the diagnosis of endometrial histological comparative study].
Leng X; Wang M; Zhang SL; Wang D; Cao W; Yang XH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 48(12):891-5. PubMed ID: 24495679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of Pipelle Mark II sampling in endometrial disease diagnosis.
Polena V; Mergui JL; Zerat L; Sananes S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Oct; 134(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 17029754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The reliability of study methods of the endometrium. A comparative study of 178 patients].
Salet-Lizee D; Gadonneix P; Van Den Akker M; Villet R
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1993; 22(6):593-9. PubMed ID: 8263287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pipelle endometrial sampling versus conventional dilatation & curettage in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding.
Abdelazim IA; Aboelezz A; Abdulkareem AF
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc; 2013; 14(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 24592061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity of pipelle endometrial sampling in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding.
Fakhar S; Saeed G; Khan AH; Alam AY
Ann Saudi Med; 2008; 28(3):188-91. PubMed ID: 18500186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pipelle versus fractional curettage for the endometrial sampling in postmenopausal women.
Bunyavejchevin S; Triratanachat S; Kankeow K; Limpaphayom KK
J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Jun; 84 Suppl 1():S326-30. PubMed ID: 11529353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
