These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15174441)
21. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness. Ehrlich JS Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The right of privacy and restraints on abortion under the "undue burden" test: a jurisprudential comparison of Planned Parenthood v. Casey with European practice and Italian law. Ross CS Indiana Int Comp Law Rev; 1993; 3():199-231. PubMed ID: 12091926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. A practical analysis of the constitutional and legal infirmities of Norplant as a condition of probation. Ballard MJ Wis Womens Law J; 1992-1993; 7-8():85-106. PubMed ID: 16617538 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. New York v. Sullivan: shhh ... don't say the "a" word! Another outcome-oriented abortion decision. Kendall CC John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):753-70. PubMed ID: 16622962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessing the viability of a substantive due process right to in vitro fertilization. Harv Law Rev; 2005 Jun; 118(8):2792-813. PubMed ID: 15988862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Ending parents' unlimited power to choose: legislation is necessary to prohibit parents' selection of their children's sex and characteristics. Plummer KM St Louis Univ Law J; 2003; 47(2):517-60. PubMed ID: 15478260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights. Reilly EA Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Prohibition of sterilization: hospital prerogative or negative pregnant? Gardner KH Boston Univ Law Rev; 1974 Jul; 54(4):828-50. PubMed ID: 11663516 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. X marks the spot while Casey strikes out: two controversial abortion decisions. Zenkich S Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1993; 23(3):1001-40. PubMed ID: 16437786 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. What Lawrence v. Texas says about the history and future of reproductive rights. Dailard C Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):717-23. PubMed ID: 16700117 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The social meaning of the Norplant condition: constitutional considerations of race, class, and gender. Albiston C Berkeley Womens Law J; 1994; 9():9-57. PubMed ID: 16767841 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Substantive due process after Gonzales v. Carhart. Calabresi SG Mich Law Rev; 2008 Jun; 106(8):1517-42. PubMed ID: 18595213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The constitution in a brave new world: a century of technological change and constitutional law. Merritt DJ Oregon Law Rev; 1990; 69(1):1-45. PubMed ID: 16044610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The phoenix of abortional freedom: is a penumbral or Ninth-Amendment right about to arise from the nineteenth-century legislative ashes of a fourteenth-century common-law liberty? Means CC N Y Law Forum; 1971; 17(2):335-410. PubMed ID: 16602212 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The use of Depo-provera for treating male sex offenders: a review of the constitutional and medical issues. Rainear DH Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 16(1):181-230. PubMed ID: 11650761 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The male abortion: the putative father's right to terminate his interests in and obligations to the unborn child. McCulley MG J Law Policy; 1988; 7(1):1-55. PubMed ID: 12666677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The right to privacy expanded: state infringements upon decisions affecting contraception subjected to strict scrutiny. Kelly KS Loyola Law Rev; 1978; 24(1):149-63. PubMed ID: 11663903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. "Partial birth" abortion and the health exception: protecting maternal health or risking abortion on demand? Glidewell G Fordham Urban Law J; 2001 Apr; 28(4):1089-150. PubMed ID: 12680381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The right to privacy and assisted reproductive technologies: a comparative study of the law of Germany and the U.S. Voss AS N Y Law Sch J Int Comp Law; 2002; 21(2):229-305. PubMed ID: 15212072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]