These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15174463)

  • 21. Putting attention on the line: investigating the activation-orientation hypothesis of pseudoneglect.
    Bultitude JH; Aimola Davies AM
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(10):1849-58. PubMed ID: 16701730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Biases of spatial attention in vision and audition.
    Sosa Y; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; McCourt ME
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 20566234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Unilateral neglect is not unilateral: evidence for additional neglect of extreme right space.
    Ellis AW; Jordan JL; Sullivan CA
    Cortex; 2006 Aug; 42(6):861-8. PubMed ID: 17131591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Grasping at sticks: pseudoneglect for perception but not action.
    Hughes LE; Bates TC; Aimola Davies A
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Aug; 157(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 15221169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bisecting the mental number line in near and far space.
    Longo MR; Lourenco SF
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 19951825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Asymmetries of visuospatial attention are modulated by viewing distance and visual field elevation: pseudoneglect in peripersonal and extrapersonal space.
    McCourt ME; Garlinghouse M
    Cortex; 2000 Dec; 36(5):715-31. PubMed ID: 11195917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bisection of shapes and lines: analysis of the visual and motor aspects of pseudoneglect.
    Macdonald-Nethercott EM; Kinnear PR; Venneri A
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Aug; 91(1):217-26. PubMed ID: 11011891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The egocentric reference deviation of neglect patients is influenced by visuospatial attention.
    Richard C; Rousseaux M; Honoré J
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(12):1784-91. PubMed ID: 16154454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fast and slow parietal pathways mediate spatial attention.
    Chambers CD; Payne JM; Stokes MG; Mattingley JB
    Nat Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 7(3):217-8. PubMed ID: 14983182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Straight-ahead pointing correlates with long-line bisection in neglect patients.
    Richard C; Honoré J; Bernati T; Rousseaux M
    Cortex; 2004 Feb; 40(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 15070003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effects of focal and global attentional systems on spatial biases.
    Powers RM; Roth HL; Heilman KM
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Aug; 58(3):318-23. PubMed ID: 15963382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Line bisection under an attentional gradient induced by simulated neglect in healthy subjects.
    Grewal P; Viswanathan J; Barton JJ; Lanyon LJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 May; 50(6):1190-201. PubMed ID: 22118912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Do perceptual asymmetries differ in peripersonal and extrapersonal space?
    Thomas NA; Elias LJ
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2010 Jan; 16(1):210-4. PubMed ID: 19835656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A critical review and meta-analysis of the perceptual pseudoneglect across psychiatric disorders: is there a continuum?
    Ribolsi M; Di Lorenzo G; Lisi G; Niolu C; Siracusano A
    Cogn Process; 2015 Feb; 16(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 25377236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Visuospatial neglect in near and far space: dissociation between line bisection and letter cancellation.
    Keller I; Schindler I; Kerkhoff G; von Rosen F; Golz D
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(5):724-31. PubMed ID: 15721185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of illusory spatial anisometry in unilateral neglect.
    Ricci R; Pia L; Gindri P
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Jan; 154(2):226-37. PubMed ID: 14557915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. How do patients with neglect see a horizontal line? Analysis of performances in coloured line bisection task.
    Misonou K; Ishiai S; Seki K; Koyama Y; Nakano N
    J Neurol; 2004 Jun; 251(6):696-703. PubMed ID: 15311345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Space representation in children with dyslexia and children without dyslexia: contribution of line bisection and circle centering tasks.
    Vieira S; Quercia P; Bonnetblanc F; Michel C
    Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Nov; 34(11):3997-4008. PubMed ID: 24036389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Lateral and vertical attentional biases in normal individuals.
    Drago V; Foster PS; Webster DG; Crucian GP; Heilman KM
    Int J Neurosci; 2007 Oct; 117(10):1415-24. PubMed ID: 17729153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Analysis of primary and secondary influences on spatial neglect.
    Adair JC; Na DL; Schwartz RL; Heilman KM
    Brain Cogn; 1998 Aug; 37(3):351-67. PubMed ID: 9733554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.