83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15175228)
1. Are there socioeconomic gradients in stage and grade of breast cancer at diagnosis? Cross sectional analysis of UK cancer registry data.
Adams J; White M; Forman D
BMJ; 2004 Jul; 329(7458):142. PubMed ID: 15175228
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Age-related variations in progression of cancer at diagnosis and completeness of cancer registry data.
Adams J; Audisio RA; White M; Forman D
Surg Oncol; 2004 Dec; 13(4):175-9. PubMed ID: 15615653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Latent class modelling of the association between socioeconomic background and breast cancer survival status at 5 years incorporating stage of disease.
Downing A; Harrison WJ; West RM; Forman D; Gilthorpe MS
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2010 Sep; 64(9):772-6. PubMed ID: 19692736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Associations among socioeconomic status, patterns of care and outcomes in breast cancer patients in a universal health care system: Ontario's experience.
Kumachev A; Trudeau ME; Chan KK
Cancer; 2016 Mar; 122(6):893-8. PubMed ID: 26696022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inequalities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis in the Trent region, and implications for the NHS Breast Screening Programme.
Cuthbertson SA; Goyder EC; Poole J
J Public Health (Oxf); 2009 Sep; 31(3):398-405. PubMed ID: 19423544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Place of residence predicts breast cancer stage at diagnosis in Estonia.
Innos K; Mägi M; Tekkel M; Aareleid T
Eur J Public Health; 2011 Jun; 21(3):376-80. PubMed ID: 20237172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The importance of location in determining breast conservation rates.
Hiotis K; Ye W; Sposto R; Goldberg J; Mukhi V; Skinner K
Am J Surg; 2005 Jul; 190(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 15972165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detecting an association between socioeconomic status and late stage breast cancer using spatial analysis and area-based measures.
MacKinnon JA; Duncan RC; Huang Y; Lee DJ; Fleming LE; Voti L; Rudolph M; Wilkinson JD
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 Apr; 16(4):756-62. PubMed ID: 17416767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of marital status on the stage at diagnosis, treatment, and survival of older women with breast cancer.
Osborne C; Ostir GV; Du X; Peek MK; Goodwin JS
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2005 Sep; 93(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 16184457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interval cancers in the Dutch breast cancer screening programme.
Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ; Beemsterboer PM; Boer R; Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH; van Ineveld BM; Broeders MJ; de Bruyn AE; van der Maas PJ
Br J Cancer; 1999 Nov; 81(5):912-7. PubMed ID: 10555768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Socioeconomic gradients in clinical stage at presentation and survival among breast cancer patients in the Stockholm area 1977-1997.
Rutqvist LE; Bern A;
Int J Cancer; 2006 Sep; 119(6):1433-9. PubMed ID: 16596647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast cancer stage at diagnosis among medically underserved women screened through the Texas Breast and Cervical Cancer Services.
Rajan SS; Begley CE; Kim B
Popul Health Manag; 2014 Aug; 17(4):202-10. PubMed ID: 24921895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A feasibility study of the evaluation of the Florida breast cancer early detection program using the statewide cancer registry.
Tamer R; Voti L; Fleming LE; MacKinnon J; Thompson D; Blake M; Bean JA; Richardson LC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2003 Oct; 81(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 14620914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Age-related socio-economic and geographic disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis: a population-based study.
Dialla PO; Arveux P; Ouedraogo S; Pornet C; Bertaut A; Roignot P; Janoray P; Poillot ML; Quipourt V; Dabakuyo-Yonli TS
Eur J Public Health; 2015 Dec; 25(6):966-72. PubMed ID: 25829506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are there socioeconomic gradients in the quality of data held by UK cancer registries?
Adams J; White M; Forman D
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2004 Dec; 58(12):1052-4. PubMed ID: 15547072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening mammography in Minnesota cancer patients.
Pagidipala S; Bushhouse S
Cancer Detect Prev; 2005; 29(2):116-23. PubMed ID: 15829371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Disparities and trends in sentinel lymph node biopsy among early-stage breast cancer patients (1998-2005).
Chen AY; Halpern MT; Schrag NM; Stewart A; Leitch M; Ward E
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Apr; 100(7):462-74. PubMed ID: 18364506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer.
White E; Miglioretti DL; Yankaskas BC; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Kerlikowske K; Saba L; Vacek PM; Carney PA; Buist DS; Oestreicher N; Barlow W; Ballard-Barbash R; Taplin SH
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Dec; 96(24):1832-9. PubMed ID: 15601639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Epidemiology of breast cancer in women in Jordan: patient characteristics and survival analysis.
Arkoob K; Al-Nsour M; Al-Nemry O; Al-Hajawi B
East Mediterr Health J; 2010 Oct; 16(10):1032-8. PubMed ID: 21222418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ascertainment of breast cancer by the Scottish Cancer Registry: an assessment based on comparison with five independent breast cancer trials databases.
Brewster DH; Stockton DL
Breast; 2008 Feb; 17(1):104-6. PubMed ID: 17855094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
