316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15175666)
21. Gaps, inexperience, inconsistencies, and overlaps: crisis in the regulation of genetically modified plants and animals.
Mandal GN
William Mary Law Rev; 2004 Apr; 45(5):2167-259. PubMed ID: 16329219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. USDA poised to reconsolidate biotech regulatory units.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Aug; 20(8):759. PubMed ID: 12147987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Stray seeds had antibiotic-resistance genes.
Macilwain C
Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7033):548. PubMed ID: 15800583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The public option. A possible change in US regulatory protocol for genetically modified organisms: compromised or enhanced objectivity?
Kuzma J; Meghani Z
EMBO Rep; 2009 Dec; 10(12):1288-93. PubMed ID: 19949408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Making 'safety first' a reality for biotechnology products.
Kapuscinski AR; Goodman RM; Hann SD; Jacobs LR; Pullins EE; Johnson CS; Kinsey JD; Krall RL; La Viña AG; Mellon MG; Ruttan VW
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jun; 21(6):599-601. PubMed ID: 12776139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Genetically engineered organic food?
Hoyle R
Nat Biotechnol; 1998 Mar; 16(3):214. PubMed ID: 9527990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. FDA transgenic animal guidance finally surfaces.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Nov; 26(11):1205-7. PubMed ID: 18997745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. GM grass eludes outmoded USDA oversight.
Waltz E
Nat Biotechnol; 2011 Sep; 29(9):772-3. PubMed ID: 21904303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Courts upbraid USDA for 'lax review' of GM crops.
Waltz E
Nat Biotechnol; 2009 Nov; 27(11):970. PubMed ID: 19898439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Food security: rigorous regulation required.
Mellon M
Science; 2010 Apr; 328(5975):171-2. PubMed ID: 20378799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. GMOs, genetically modified organisms or genuinely mixed opinions? A reasonable Consumer’s understanding of the terms "GMO" and "non-GMO," and the struggle to set a Standard. .
Kromka NJ
Seton Hall Law Rev; 2017; 48(1):221-48. PubMed ID: 29236423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. US academia held accountable for GM products.
Powell K
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jul; 21(7):720-1. PubMed ID: 12833077
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The environmental impact subterfuge.
Conko G; Miller HI
Nat Biotechnol; 2010 Dec; 28(12):1256-8. PubMed ID: 21139607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Genetically engineered crops for biofuel production: regulatory perspectives.
Lee D; Chen A; Nair R
Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev; 2008; 25():331-61. PubMed ID: 21412361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Divisions sink US consensus effort on transgenic food.
Knight J
Nature; 2003 Jun; 423(6940):574. PubMed ID: 12789300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Researchers and policymakers are now free to tackle the most-pressing GM issues.
Nature; 2016 Jul; 535(7611):199. PubMed ID: 27411597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. US Presidential transition prompts biotech policy frenzy.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Mar; 19(3):183-4. PubMed ID: 11231515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The international regulation of genetically modified organisms: importing caution into the U.S. food supply.
Strauss DM
Food Drug Law J; 2006; 61(2):167-96. PubMed ID: 16903028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. USDA appeases organic lobby.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Mar; 17(3):217. PubMed ID: 10096276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. US federal agencies add extra steps for handling GM plants.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):862. PubMed ID: 12205494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
