These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15176613)

  • 1. Estimation of lifted weight and produced effort through perception of point-light display.
    Shim J; Carlton LG; Kim J
    Perception; 2004; 33(3):277-91. PubMed ID: 15176613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The limits of visual mass perception.
    Shim J; Hecht H; Lee JE; Yook DW; Kim JT
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2210-21. PubMed ID: 19391043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perception of Kinematic Characteristics in the Motion of Lifted Weight.
    Shim J; Carlton LG
    J Mot Behav; 1997 Jun; 29(2):131-46. PubMed ID: 12453790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relative influences of movement kinematics and extrinsic object characteristics on the perception of lifted weight.
    Grierson LE; Ohson S; Lyons J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1906-13. PubMed ID: 24027032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lift observation conveys object weight distribution but partly enhances predictive lift planning.
    Rens G; Orban de Xivry JJ; Davare M; van Polanen V
    J Neurophysiol; 2021 Apr; 125(4):1348-1366. PubMed ID: 33471619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of competing perceptual and motor priors in the context of the size-weight illusion.
    Buckingham G; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Aug; 205(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 20614213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictive force programming in the grip-lift task: the role of memory links between arbitrary cues and object weight.
    Ameli M; Dafotakis M; Fink GR; Nowak DA
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(9):2383-8. PubMed ID: 18455203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of asymmetric dynamic and isometric liftings on strength/force and rating of perceived exertion.
    Hattori Y; Ono Y; Shimaoka M; Hiruta S; Kamijima M; Shibata E; Ichihara G; Ando S; Villaneuva MB; Takeuchi Y
    Ergonomics; 1996 Jun; 39(6):862-76. PubMed ID: 8681928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Living in a material world: how visual cues to material properties affect the way that we lift objects and perceive their weight.
    Buckingham G; Cant JS; Goodale MA
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Dec; 102(6):3111-8. PubMed ID: 19793879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural gain changes subserving perceptual acuity.
    Jones LF; Burgess PR
    Somatosens Mot Res; 1998; 15(3):190-9. PubMed ID: 9874518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Object properties and cognitive load in the formation of associative memory during precision lifting.
    Li Y; Randerath J; Bauer H; Marquardt C; Goldenberg G; Hermsdörfer J
    Behav Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 196(1):123-30. PubMed ID: 18722479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual properties of objects affect manipulative forces and respiration differently.
    Lamberg EM; Mateika JH; Gordon AM
    Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 1066(1-2):158-63. PubMed ID: 16337926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Kinematic form and scaling: further investigations on the visual perception of lifted weight.
    Bingham GP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1987 May; 13(2):155-77. PubMed ID: 2953848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptual weight judgments when viewing one's own and others' movements under minimalist conditions of visual presentation.
    Auvray M; Hoellinger T; Hanneton S; Roby-Brami A
    Perception; 2011; 40(9):1081-103. PubMed ID: 22208129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Size-weight illusion, anticipation, and adaptation of fingertip forces in patients with cerebellar degeneration.
    Rabe K; Brandauer B; Li Y; Gizewski ER; Timmann D; Hermsdörfer J
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Feb; 101(2):569-79. PubMed ID: 19036861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The size-weight illusion in team lifting.
    Naylor YK; Amazeen EL
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(2):349-56. PubMed ID: 15359682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Illusions of force perception: the role of sensori-motor predictions, visual information, and motor errors.
    Diedrichsen J; Verstynen T; Hon A; Zhang Y; Ivry RB
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 May; 97(5):3305-13. PubMed ID: 17344369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual perception of lifted weight from kinematic and static (photographic) displays.
    Valenti SS; Costall A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Feb; 23(1):181-98. PubMed ID: 9090151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Discriminability of load heaviness: implications for the psychophysical approach to manual lifting.
    Karwowski W; Shumate C; Yates JW; Pongpatana N
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):729-44. PubMed ID: 1633786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Understanding individual differences in lifting mechanics: Do some people adopt motor control strategies that minimize biomechanical exposure.
    Armstrong DP; Fischer SL
    Hum Mov Sci; 2020 Dec; 74():102689. PubMed ID: 33130385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.