These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15176617)

  • 21. Effects of external feedback about body tilt: Influence on the Subjective Proprioceptive Horizon.
    Bringoux L; Bourdin C; Nougier V; Raphel C
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Nov; 408(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 16982145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of self-motion on attention in real 3D space.
    Kimura T; Miura T; Doi S; Yamamoto Y
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jul; 131(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 19524213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The perception of body orientation after neck-proprioceptive stimulation. Effects of time and of visual cueing.
    Karnath HO; Reich E; Rorden C; Fetter M; Driver J
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Apr; 143(3):350-8. PubMed ID: 11889513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Systematic biases in the tactile perception of the subjective vertical in patients with unilateral neglect and the influence of upright vs. supine posture.
    Funk J; Finke K; Müller HJ; Preger R; Kerkhoff G
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(1):298-308. PubMed ID: 19782092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Vestibular perception of self-rotation in different postures: a comparison between sitting and standing subjects.
    Becker W; Jürgens R; Boss T
    Exp Brain Res; 2000 Apr; 131(4):468-76. PubMed ID: 10803415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Visual context modulates the subjective vertical in neglect: evidence for an increased rod-and-frame-effect.
    Funk J; Finke K; Müller HJ; Utz KS; Kerkhoff G
    Neuroscience; 2011 Jan; 173():124-34. PubMed ID: 21073929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Disturbed egocentric space representation in cervical dystonia.
    Müller SV; Gläser P; Tröger M; Dengler R; Johannes S; Münte TF
    Mov Disord; 2005 Jan; 20(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 15390129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Perception threshold for tilt.
    Janssen M; Lauvenberg M; van der Ven W; Bloebaum T; Kingma H
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jul; 32(5):818-25. PubMed ID: 21659931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Perception of spatial orientation in spasmodic torticollis. Part I: The postural vertical.
    Anastasopoulos D; Bhatia K; Bisdorff A; Bronstein AM; Gresty MA; Marsden CD
    Mov Disord; 1997 Jul; 12(4):561-9. PubMed ID: 9251075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The role of cognitive factors in the rod-and-frame effect.
    Cian C; Raphel C; Barraud PA
    Perception; 2001; 30(12):1427-38. PubMed ID: 11817750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Electrophysiological evidence for a post-perceptual influence of global visual context on perceived orientation.
    Corbett JE; Enns JT; Handy TC
    Brain Res; 2009 Oct; 1292():82-92. PubMed ID: 19632209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of head tilt on perception of self-orientation while in a greater than one G environment.
    Chelette TL; Martin EJ; Albery WB
    J Vestib Res; 1995; 5(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 7711943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Visually perceived vertical (VPV): induced changes in orientation by 1-line and 2-line roll-tilted and pitched visual fields.
    Li W; Matin L
    Vision Res; 2005 Jul; 45(15):2037-57. PubMed ID: 15820520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Complex interactions between spatial, orientation, and motion cues for biological motion perception across visual space.
    Thurman SM; Lu H
    J Vis; 2013 Feb; 13(2):8. PubMed ID: 23390322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Orientation of Listing's plane after hypergravity in humans.
    Nooij SA; Bos JE; Groen EL
    J Vestib Res; 2008; 18(2-3):97-105. PubMed ID: 19126980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Kinesthetic estimation of the main orientations from the upright and supine positions.
    Lejeune L; Thouvarecq R; Anderson DI; Jouen F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004 Sep; 117(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 15288227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Where do you think you are? Effects of conceptual current position on spatial memory performance.
    Shelton AL; Marchette SA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):686-98. PubMed ID: 20438266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Vertical frames of reference and control of body orientation.
    Carriot J; DiZio P; Nougier V
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2008 Dec; 38(6):423-37. PubMed ID: 19026962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Perceived body orientation in microgravity: effects of prior experience and pressure under the feet.
    Carriot J; Bringoux L; Charles C; Mars F; Nougier V; Cian C
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2004 Sep; 75(9):795-9. PubMed ID: 15460632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Adaptive changes in perception of body orientation and mental image rotation in microgravity.
    Clement G; Berthoz A; Lestienne F
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1987 Sep; 58(9 Pt 2):A159-63. PubMed ID: 3499892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.