These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15177594)

  • 1. Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and the contrast sensitivity function.
    Quesnel NM; Lovasik JV; Ferremi C; Boileau M; Ieraci C
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Jun; 30(6):1209-18. PubMed ID: 15177594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improved contrast sensitivity and visual acuity after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: in-depth statistical analysis.
    Tuan KM; Liang J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Feb; 32(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 16564995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. One-year clinical results after epi-LASIK for myopia.
    Katsanevaki VJ; Kalyvianaki MI; Kavroulaki DS; Pallikaris IG
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jun; 114(6):1111-7. PubMed ID: 17320960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes: potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Tran DB; Sarayba MA; Bor Z; Garufis C; Duh YJ; Soltes CR; Juhasz T; Kurtz RM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 15721701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Thin flap laser in situ keratomileusis: analysis of contrast sensitivity, visual, and refractive outcomes.
    Cobo-Soriano R; Calvo MA; Beltrán J; Llovet FL; Baviera J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jul; 31(7):1357-65. PubMed ID: 16105607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ten-year follow-up of laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia of up to -10 diopters.
    Alió JL; Muftuoglu O; Ortiz D; Pérez-Santonja JJ; Artola A; Ayala MJ; Garcia MJ; de Luna GC
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Jan; 145(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 18154754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. One year follow-up of contrast sensitivity following conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis.
    Townley D; Kirwan C; O'Keefe M
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Feb; 90(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 20070279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Wavefront-guided versus standard LASIK enhancement for residual refractive errors.
    Alió JL; Montés-Mico R
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 16378639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome LASIK for myopia.
    Montés-Micó R; Rodríguez-Galietero A; Alió JL
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 17070593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Contrast sensitivity and higher order aberration after conventional LASIK treatment].
    Loukotová V; Vlková E; Horácková M; Tokosová E; Pirnerová L; Hlinomazová Z; Dvoráková D; Nĕmec J
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2009 Oct; 65(5):167-75. PubMed ID: 20052819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of pupil diameter on the relation between ocular higher-order aberration and contrast sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Oshika T; Tokunaga T; Samejima T; Miyata K; Kawana K; Kaji Y
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Apr; 47(4):1334-8. PubMed ID: 16565365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A control-matched comparison of laser epithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia.
    Tobaigy FM; Ghanem RC; Sayegh RR; Hallak JA; Azar DT
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 142(6):901-8. PubMed ID: 17157575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis: contralateral comparative study.
    Padmanabhan P; Mrochen M; Basuthkar S; Viswanathan D; Joseph R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Mar; 34(3):389-97. PubMed ID: 18299062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Topographic and biomechanical differences between hyperopic and myopic laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Qazi MA; Roberts CJ; Mahmoud AM; Pepose JS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):48-60. PubMed ID: 15721696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for the correction of high myopia.
    Kim JK; Kim SS; Lee HK; Lee IS; Seong GJ; Kim EK; Han SH
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Jul; 30(7):1405-11. PubMed ID: 15210215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CustomVue laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and myopic astigmatism using the Visx S4 excimer laser: Efficacy, predictability, and safety.
    Partal AE; Manche EE
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Mar; 32(3):475-9. PubMed ID: 16631061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ten-year follow-up of laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia.
    Alió JL; Muftuoglu O; Ortiz D; Pérez-Santonja JJ; Artola A; Ayala MJ; Garcia MJ; de Luna GC
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Jan; 145(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 17996210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of an aspheric treatment algorithm in decreasing induced spherical aberration after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Ang RE; Chan WK; Wee TL; Lee HM; Bunnapradist P; Cox I
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Aug; 35(8):1348-57. PubMed ID: 19631119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bitoric laser in situ keratomileusis for astigmatism.
    Albarrán-Diego C; Muñoz G; Montés-Micó R; Alió JL
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Jul; 30(7):1471-8. PubMed ID: 15210225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative study of higher-order aberrations after conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia using the technolas 217z laser platform.
    Kirwan C; O'Keefe M
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jan; 147(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 18775529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.