BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15177736)

  • 1. Embedding expert knowledge in a decision model: evaluating natural attenuation at TCE sites.
    Stiber NA; Pantazidou M; Small MJ
    J Hazard Mater; 2004 Jul; 110(1-3):151-60. PubMed ID: 15177736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multi-criteria decision analysis for the optimal management of nitrate contamination of aquifers.
    Almasri MN; Kaluarachchi JJ
    J Environ Manage; 2005 Mar; 74(4):365-81. PubMed ID: 15737460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Biotest studies for evaluating hazardous waste water with reference to section 7a WHG].
    Hagendorf U; Börnert W
    Schriftenr Ver Wasser Boden Lufthyg; 1992; 89():501-22. PubMed ID: 1307816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A high-level synthesis of oil spill response equipment and countermeasures.
    Ventikos NP; Vergetis E; Psaraftis HN; Triantafyllou G
    J Hazard Mater; 2004 Feb; 107(1-2):51-8. PubMed ID: 15036642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Waste green sands as reactive media for groundwater contaminated with trichloroethylene (TCE).
    Lee T; Benson CH; Eykholt GR
    J Hazard Mater; 2004 Jun; 109(1-3):25-36. PubMed ID: 15177742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intelligent ship traffic monitoring for oil spill prevention: risk based decision support building on AIS.
    Eide MS; Endresen O; Brett PO; Ervik JL; Røang K
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2007 Feb; 54(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 17178131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying the effects of fumarate on in situ reductive dechlorination rates.
    Hageman KJ; Field JA; Istok JD; Semprini L
    J Contam Hydrol; 2004 Dec; 75(3-4):281-96. PubMed ID: 15610903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decision support-oriented selection of remediation technologies to rehabilitate contaminated sites.
    Critto A; Cantarella L; Carlon C; Giove S; Petruzzelli G; Marcomini A
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Jul; 2(3):273-85. PubMed ID: 16869441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Water pollution from major industries in Paradip area--a case study.
    Patnaik KN; Satyanarayana SV; Rout SP
    Indian J Environ Health; 2002 Jul; 44(3):203-11. PubMed ID: 14503444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Leaching behaviour of coal-ash: a case study.
    Hajarnavis MR; Bhide AD
    Indian J Environ Health; 2003 Oct; 45(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 15527023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigation of temporal trends in hydrochemical quality of surface water in Western Turkey.
    Boyacioglu H; Boyacioglu H
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2008 May; 80(5):469-74. PubMed ID: 18484227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of remedial countermeasures using the analytic network process.
    Promentilla MA; Furuichi T; Ishii K; Tanikawa N
    Waste Manag; 2006; 26(12):1410-21. PubMed ID: 16412627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Microbial sensors for determination of biochemical oxygen consumption].
    Riedel K; Neumann B; Uthemann R
    Schriftenr Ver Wasser Boden Lufthyg; 1992; 89():403-11. PubMed ID: 1307809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Natural attenuation of trichloroethene and its degradation products at a lake-shore site.
    An YJ; Kampbell DH; Weaver JW; Wilson JT; Jeong SW
    Environ Pollut; 2004 Aug; 130(3):325-35. PubMed ID: 15182966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Continuous biological test procedures for monitoring waste water and event controlled sampling techniques].
    Hansen PD
    Schriftenr Ver Wasser Boden Lufthyg; 1992; 89():223-32. PubMed ID: 1307793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Biosensors for water monitoring--status and possibilities].
    Schmid RD; Bilitewski U; Wittmann C
    Schriftenr Ver Wasser Boden Lufthyg; 1992; 89():395-402. PubMed ID: 1307808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Management of chemical substances in a water environment communicating among stakeholders.
    Yamagata H; Saino H; Suzuki H; Kobayashi H; Minamiyama M; Fujita K; Sakai K; Takahashi M
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 18192747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of a site-specific Ecological Risk Assessment for contaminated sites: part II. A multi-criteria based system for the selection of bioavailability assessment tools.
    Semenzin E; Critto A; Carlon C; Rutgers M; Marcomini A
    Sci Total Environ; 2007 Jun; 379(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 17434575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. River pollution from non-point sources: a new simplified method of assessment.
    Munafò M; Cecchi G; Baiocco F; Mancini L
    J Environ Manage; 2005 Oct; 77(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 15990217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating LNAPL contamination using GPR signal attenuation analysis and dielectric property measurements: practical implications for hydrological studies.
    Cassidy NJ
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Oct; 94(1-2):49-75. PubMed ID: 17601633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.