These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15177820)

  • 1. Memory effects in syntactic ERP tasks.
    Sabourin L; Stowe L
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Jul; 55(2):392-5. PubMed ID: 15177820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When word category information encounters morphosyntax: an ERP study.
    Rossi S; Gugler MF; Hahne A; Friederici AD
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Aug; 384(3):228-33. PubMed ID: 15893877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Late interaction of syntactic and prosodic processes in sentence comprehension as revealed by ERPs.
    Eckstein K; Friederici AD
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):130-43. PubMed ID: 15967649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.
    Hoeks JC; Stowe LA; Doedens G
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 19(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 14972359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Large-scale neural network for sentence processing.
    Cooke A; Grossman M; DeVita C; Gonzalez-Atavales J; Moore P; Chen W; Gee J; Detre J
    Brain Lang; 2006 Jan; 96(1):14-36. PubMed ID: 16168473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Event-related potentials suggest early interaction between syntax and semantics during on-line sentence comprehension.
    Palolahti M; Leino S; Jokela M; Kopra K; Paavilainen P
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Aug; 384(3):222-7. PubMed ID: 15894426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Localization of syntactic and semantic brain responses using magnetoencephalography.
    Service E; Helenius P; Maury S; Salmelin R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jul; 19(7):1193-205. PubMed ID: 17583994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Event-related potential (ERP) responses to violations of inflectional and derivational rules of Finnish.
    Leinonen A; Brattico P; Järvenpää M; Krause CM
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1218():181-93. PubMed ID: 18514637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An inverse relation between event-related and time-frequency violation responses in sentence processing.
    Davidson DJ; Indefrey P
    Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 1158():81-92. PubMed ID: 17560965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retrieval and unification of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: an FMRI study using word-category ambiguity.
    Snijders TM; Vosse T; Kempen G; Van Berkum JJ; Petersson KM; Hagoort P
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 Jul; 19(7):1493-503. PubMed ID: 19001084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neurodynamics of sentence interpretation: ERP evidence from French.
    Isel F; Hahne A; Maess B; Friederici AD
    Biol Psychol; 2007 Mar; 74(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 17011692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differential components of sentence comprehension: beyond single word reading and memory.
    Cutting LE; Clements AM; Courtney S; Rimrodt SL; Schafer JG; Bisesi J; Pekar JJ; Pugh KR
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jan; 29(2):429-38. PubMed ID: 16253527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A deeper reanalysis of a superficial feature: an ERP study on agreement violations.
    Molinaro N; Vespignani F; Job R
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1228():161-76. PubMed ID: 18619420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Grammatical gender and number agreement in Spanish: an ERP comparison.
    Barber H; Carreiras M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Jan; 17(1):137-53. PubMed ID: 15701245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Processing the universal quantifier during sentence comprehension: ERP evidence.
    Jiang X; Tan Y; Zhou X
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jul; 47(8-9):1799-815. PubMed ID: 19428412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ERP effects of the processing of syntactic long-distance dependencies.
    Phillips C; Kazanina N; Abada SH
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 22(3):407-28. PubMed ID: 15722211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What is heavier, a kilo of feathers or a kilo of lead? What you know determines what you understand.
    Macizo P; Herrera A
    Neuroreport; 2010 Oct; 21(14):938-42. PubMed ID: 20717062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Syntactic event-related potential components in 24-month-olds' sentence comprehension.
    Oberecker R; Friederici AD
    Neuroreport; 2006 Jul; 17(10):1017-21. PubMed ID: 16791095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contextual information modulates initial processes of syntactic integration: the role of inter- versus intrasentential predictions.
    Bornkessel I; Schlesewsky M; Friederici AD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):871-82. PubMed ID: 14516220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.